[1]李晓伟,王 炜,杨 敏,等.旅客区域多模式交通出行行为特征与服务质量感知差异[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2017,49(05):685-0692.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2017.05.011]
 LI Xiaowei,WANG Wei,YANG Min,et al.Passengers travel behavior characteristics and service quality perception differences for regional multi-mode transportation[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2017,49(05):685-0692.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2017.05.011]
点击复制

旅客区域多模式交通出行行为特征与服务质量感知差异()
分享到:

西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版)[ISSN:1006-7930/CN:61-1295/TU]

卷:
49
期数:
2017年05期
页码:
685-0692
栏目:
出版日期:
2017-10-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Passengers travel behavior characteristics and service quality perception differences for regional multi-mode transportation
文章编号:
1006-7930(2017)05-0685-08
作者:
李晓伟12王 炜2杨 敏2王 昊2徐铖铖2
(1.西安建筑科技大学 土木工程学院,陕西 西安 710055;2.东南大学 交通学院,江苏  南京 210096))
Author(s):
LI Xiaowei12 WANG Wei2 YANG Min2 WANG Hao 2 XU Chengcheng2
(1. School of Civil Engineering, Xi’an Univ. of arch. & Tech., Xi an 710055,China; 2. School of Transportation, Southeast University , Nanjing 210096,China)
关键词:
多模式交通出行特征集散特征服务质量购票行为统计分析
Keywords:
Multi-mode transportation trip characteristics distribution characteristics service quality purchase behavior statistical analysis
分类号:
U121
DOI:
10.15986/j.1006-7930.2017.05.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
通过对旅客区域多模式交通出行的抽样调查,归纳和分析了不同交通模式下旅客的出行特征,包括性别、年龄结构、职业分布、收入特征、小汽车拥有特征、出行目的、购票方式等;应用数理统计方法对比旅客区域多模式交通的平均出行距离、平均运行时间和平均出行费用以及旅客多模式交通出行的中转换乘与集散特征;分析比较了旅客多模式交通服务感知水平,包括安全性、舒适性、准时性等。研究表明:飞机、高铁、普铁、高速巴士的平均运距分别为1 451 km、669 km、843 km、334km,平均出行费用为815元、295元、150元、90元,城际平均出行时间为2.93 h、4.11 h、8.07 h、4.22 h;四种运输方式中,安全性、舒适性、准时性最好的分别为高铁、飞机、高铁,集散时间从小到大分别是高速巴士、普铁、高铁、飞机;网络购票已成为最主要的购票方式。研究成果可为探寻我国旅客多模式交通出行行为规律,改善多模式综合交通运输系统的运营服务水平提供较为准确的现场调查资料。
Abstract:
Through sampling survey of passengers’ multi-mode transportation, this paper concluded and analyzed passengers’ traveling characteristics under different modes, including gender, age structure, occupational distribution, income feature, car ownership, travelling purpose and ticket buying way etc. Descriptive statistics was applied to contrast average transportation distance, average running time and average travelling expense as well as transit transfer, gathering and distribution features in passengers’ multi-mode transportation. Meanwhile, passengers’ multi-mode transportation service perception level including safety, comfort, punctuality and convenience were analyzed and compared. The research results indicate that average transportation distance of airplane, high-speed railway, ordinary railway and express bus is 1451 km, 669 km, 842 km and 334 km, respectively. Their average transportation expense is 815 Yuan, 295 Yuan, 150 Yuan and 90 Yuan, respectively. The corresponding intercity transportation time is 2.93h, 4.11h, 8.07h and 4.22h. Among the four transportation modes, high-speed railway has the best safety, punctuality and convenience; airplane has the best comfort. The time for gathering and distribution is sorted in ascending order as follows: bus, ordinary railway, high-speed railway and airplane. Ticket buying via network has become the uppermost ticket buying way. The research results can offer accurate field survey data for exploring passengers’ behavior law of multi-mode transportation and improving operation service level of multi-mode comprehensive transportation system.

参考文献/References:

参考文献References
[1]宋凯,徐满满城市群城际旅客出行行为特征分析[J].现代城市轨道交通, 2012,(4):6670.
SONG Kai, XU Manman Passenger behavior characteristics of intercity travel about urban agglomeration [J]. Modern Urban Rail Transit, 2012, (4): 6670.
[2]李建斌武广高速铁路旅客出行特征和集散特性调查与分析[J].铁道标准设计,2011, (11):15.
LI Jianbin Investigation and analysis on passenger travel and distribution characteristics for high speed railway from Wuhan to Guangzhou [J].Railway Standard Design, 2011, (11): 15.
[3]陈维忠,黄金川,闫梅,等北京航空旅客出行特征及新机场旅客分担[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(10): 13601368
CHEN Weizhong, HUANG Jinchuan, YAN Mei, et al Research on the characteristics of Beijing passengers and the distribution rate of new airport [J]. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(10): 13601368.
[4]YAO E, MORIKAWA T A study of on integrated intercity travel demand model [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2005, 39(4), 367381.
[5]GRAYSON A Disaggregate model of mode choice in intercity travel [J]. Transportation Research Record, 1981, 835: 3642.
[6]WILSON F R, DAMODARAN S, DAVID I J Disaggregate mode choice models for intercity passenger travel in Canada [J]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineer, 1990, 17: 187191.
[7]DOBRUSZKES F, DEHON C, GIVONI M Does European highspeed rail affect the current level of air services? An EUwide analysis [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2014, 69, 461475.
[8]NESSET E, HELGESEN Φ Effects of switching costs on customer attitude loyalty to an airport in a multiairport region [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2014, 67, 240253.
[9]PELLEGRINI P, RODRIGUEZ J Single European sky and single European railway area: A system level analysis of air and rail transportation [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2013, 57, 6486.
[10]NJAV E,RIETVELD P  Could you also have made this trip by another mode? An investigation of perceived travel possibilities of car and train travellers on the main travel corridors to the city of Amsterdam, The Netherlands [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2009, 43(4), 374385.

相似文献/References:

[1]李晓伟,王 炜,杨 敏,等.多模式综合交通客运方式选择行为差异性—基于强制与休闲型活动出行的对比分析[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2016,48(06):868.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2016.06.015]
 LI Xiaowei,WANG Wei,YANG Min,et al.Disparity of choice behavior for multi-mode passenger transport system—A comparative analysis of the compulsory and leisure activities travel[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2016,48(05):868.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2016.06.015]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2016-09-10
修改稿日期:2017-08-23
基金项目:国家自然科学基金重点项目(51338003),陕西省自然科学青年基金(2017JQ5086) ,陕西省住房城乡建设科技开发计划项目(2015~K54),陕西省教育厅专项科研计划项目(15JK1403)
第一作者:李晓伟(1985-),男,博士,讲师,主要从事交通规划与设计研究. E-mail:185381729@qq.com

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-11-09