[1]黄 炜,李 斌,张 巍,等.不同内填材料的生态复合墙结构地震反应分析[J].西安建筑科技大学学报:自然科学版,2014,46(04):479-483.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2014.04.004]
　HUANG Wei,ZHANG Wei,ZHANG Chenghua,et al.Seismic response analysis on the eco-composite analysis wall structure in-filled with different materials[J].J.Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.:Natural Science Edition,2014,46(04):479-483.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2014.04.004]
点击复制

不同内填材料的生态复合墙结构地震反应分析()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报:自然科学版[ISSN:1006-7930/CN:61-1295/TU]

卷:
46
期数:
2014年04期
页码:
479-483
栏目:
出版日期:
2014-08-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Seismic response analysis on the eco-composite analysis wall structure in-filled with different materials
文章编号:
1006-7930(2014)04-0479-05
作者:
黄 炜 1; 李 斌 1; 张 巍 1; 张程华 1; 2; 王冬 冬 1
( 1.西安建筑科技大学土木工程学院,陕西 西安 710055;2. 西安科技大学建筑与土木工程学院,陕西 西安 710054 )
Author(s):
HUANG Wei1 ;  ZHANG Wei1 ;  ZHANG Chenghua1; 2;  WANG Dongdong1
(1. School of Civil Engineering, Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech., Xi’an 710055, China; 2. School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)
关键词:
生态复合墙结构; 内填材料; 刚架-复合弹性板力学模型; 地震反应
Keywords:
ecological composite wall structure;  fill material;  framework-composite elastic shaking table model;  seismic response
分类号:
TU313;TU375
DOI:
10.15986/j.1006-7930.2014.04.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
生态复合墙体作为一种新型的生态环保住宅结构体系，其内填材料要满足因地制宜、就地取材的原则，本文在课题组已研发和应用的五种生态复合墙体材料的基础上，采用经过验证的刚架-复合弹性板力学模型，对结构进行弹性阶段的动力反应对比分析，并模拟原型结构在弹性阶段的动力特性．利用该模型对某工程实例分析研究，计算分析结果表明：在多种地震波作用下，内填石膏砌块墙体频率最大，其余四种材料频率较为接近，内填草砖时频率最小；当内填草砖时，侧移及层间位移最大，内填陶粒块和发泡块时，侧移及层间位移较为接近，而内填石膏时最小；五种不同内填材料的楼层加速度曲线趋势大体趋于一致．
Abstract:
Composite wall is a new type of ecological environmental protection residential structure system, and its fill material can meet the principle of adjust measures to local conditions. This paper is based on five kinds of ecological composite wall material which the group had researched and developed, using proven frame -composite elastic plate mechanics model to contrast analysis of the structure of elastic stage dynamic response and simulate the dynamic performance of the prototype structure in elastic stage. Analysis by using the model of a certain engineering example, calculation and results show that under many kinds of seismic wave, the filling of gypsum block wall peak frequency, frequency of the rest of the four kinds of material is close, frequency is the minimum when filled with the grass brick. When filled with the grass in brick, the lateral displacement and displacement between the layers is the largest. When the wall is filled with ceramsite block and foam block, the lateral displacement and displacement between the layers is relatively close, and it is minimum when filled with gypsum. The wall is filled with material within the five different material floor acceleration curve trend generally tend to be more consistent.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陈国新, 黄炜, 张荫. 内填不同材料填充砌块生态复合墙体抗震性能对比[J]. 中南大学学报, 2012, 43(11):4491-4500.

CHEN Guoxin, HUANG Wei, ZHANG Yin. Comparison on seismic behavior of ecological composite walls filled with different materials block[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 43(11):4491-4500.

[2] 陈国新. 基于统一强度理论的生态复合墙体计算模型与承载力分析[D]. 西安:西安建筑科技大学, 2010.

CHEN Guoxin. Analysis on calculation model and bearing capacity of ecological composite-wall based on the twin shear unified strength theory[D]. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, 2010.

[3] 邵永健, 朱聘儒. 轻骨料混凝土的应力-应变曲线的研究[J]. 混凝土与水泥制品, 2005(1):19-21.

SHAO Yongjian, ZHU Pinru. The study of the stress-strain curve of lightweight aggregate concrete[J]. China Concrete and Cement Products, 2005(1):19-21.

[4] 张福占. 发泡混凝土的特点及应用[J]. 建筑与工程, 2008(23):144-145.

ZHANG Fuzhan. The characteristics and applications of the foamed concrete[J]. Architecture and engineering, 2008(23):144-145.

[5] 颜雪洲. 泡沫混凝土力学性能试验研究[J]. 工业建筑, 2007(S1):962-964.

YAN Xuezhou. Experimental study on the mechanical property of foamed concrete[J]. Industrial Construction, 2007(S1):962-964.

[6] WANG C M, KITIPORNCHAI S, LIM C W, et al. Beam bending solutions based on nonlocal Timoshenko beam theory[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 134(6):475-481.

[7] 左仲存. 混凝土灌芯石膏板简化计算模型及受力性能分析[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2007. 01.

ZUO Zhongcun. Concrete pouring core plasterboard simplified calculation model and mechanical performance analysis[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2007. 01.

[8] 黄炜, 张程华. 密肋壁板结构简化计算模型对比分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2009, 28(7): 187-191.

HUANG Wei, ZHANG Chenghua. Comparative analysis of simplified computation models of a multi-ribbed slab structure[J]. Journal of vibration and shock, 2009, 28(7): 187- 191.

[9] CHOPRA A K, RAKESH X, GOEL K. Direct displacement bared design: use of inelastic vs. elastic design spectra[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2001, 17(1):47-64.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：国家“十二五”科技支撑项目（ 2012BAJ16B02）；国家自然科学基金项目（ 51178385）
收稿日期： 2013-11-20修改稿日期： 2014-07-25
作者简介：黄炜（1976- ），男，博士，教授，主要从事新型建筑结构体系研究． E-mail: qqhuangwei2005@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-10-06