[1]张 群,王思颖.中国大陆与台湾地区绿色建筑评价标准 指标制定与认证现状比较研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报:自然科学版,2014,46(02):256-260.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2004.02.018]
　ZHANG Qun,WANG Siying.Comparative study on parameters establishment and certification statusbetween green building evaluation criteria of China’s mainland and Taiwan[J].J.Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.:Natural Science Edition,2014,46(02):256-260.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2004.02.018]
点击复制

中国大陆与台湾地区绿色建筑评价标准 指标制定与认证现状比较研究()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报:自然科学版[ISSN:1006-7930/CN:61-1295/TU]

卷:
46
期数:
2014年02期
页码:
256-260
栏目:
出版日期:
2014-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative study on parameters establishment and certification status
between green building evaluation criteria of China’s mainland and Taiwan
文章编号:
1006-7930(2014)02-0256-05
作者:
张 群; 王思颖
(西安建筑科技大学建筑学院,西安 710055TU201.03 文献标志码：A 文章编号：1006-7930(2014)
Author(s):
ZHANG Qun;  WANG Siying
( School of Architecture, Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech. , Xi’an 710055,China)
关键词:
绿色建筑评价标准; 大陆地区; 台湾地区; 指标制定; 认证现状; 比较研究
Keywords:
evaluation standard for green building;  the mainland;  Taiwan area of China;  parameters establishment;  certification status;  comparative analysis
分类号:
TU201.03
DOI:
10.15986/j.1006-7930.2004.02.018
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了提升中国大陆绿色建筑评价标准的发展水平，在等级评定、同类指标适用性、获评案例信息三个方面对中国大陆
与台湾地区的绿色建筑评价标准进行比较分析，得出了两者在评价方式、等级指标、气候类型适用性方面的差异，提出了完
善大陆绿色建筑评价标准的建议，为我国绿色建筑评价事业做出有益的技术支持．
Abstract:
This study is designed to improve the development level of mainland China’s green building evaluation criteria. Through the comparison of two evaluation schemes on three aspects of grade evaluation, the applicability of similar parameters and the situation of approved projects, the differences on assessment mode, parameters levels and the applicability of climate types are clear. For that result, this paper puts forward a suggestion to perfect the mainland China’s green building evaluation criteria and make useful technical support for our green building assessment

参考文献/References:

[1] 林宪德. 绿建筑解说与评估手册[M]. 2009 年版. 台北: 建筑研究所, 2010.
LIN Xiande. Evaluation manual for green buildings[M]. 2009 ed. Taipei: Architecture and Building Research Institute, 2010.
[2] GB/T50378-2006 绿色建筑评价标准[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2006.
GB/T50378-2006 Evaluation standard for green building [S]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2006.
[3] 李涛, 刘丛红. LEED 与《绿色建筑评价标准》结构体系对比研究[J]. 建筑学报, 2011(3): 75-78.
LI Tao, LIU Conghong. Comparison of the framework of LEED with ESGB [J]. Architectural Journal, 2011(3): 75-78.
[4] LEE W L. A comprehensive review of metrics of building environmental assessment schemes[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2012,
62: 403-413.
[5] 林宪德. 台湾绿色建筑新分级评估系统TREND-2[C]//第五届中国城市住宅研讨会论文集. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 20
05: 47-52.
LIN Xiande. New rating system of green building system TREND-2 in Taiwan[C]//Proceedings of the Fifth China Urban
Housing Conference. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2005: 47-52.
[6] 黄一翔, 栗德祥. 关于国内生态住宅评价标准的指导性分析[J]. 华中建筑, 2006, 24(10): 107-109.
HUANG Yixiang, LI Dexiang. Analysis of the instructive ability of the evaluation criteria of the ecological residence in china
[J]. Huazhong Architecture, 2006, 24(10): 107-109.
[7] GB. 核可案件公告[EB/OL]. [2013-10-29]. http: //www. tabc. org. tw/tw/modules/news/article. php?storyid=280.
GB. Approved cases announcement[EB/OL]. [2013-10-29]. http: //www. tabc. org. tw/tw/modules/news/article. php?stor
yid=280.
[8] 住房城乡建设部. 住房城乡建设部关于2009 年度第一批: 2013 年度第十一批绿色建筑评价标识项目的公告[EB/OL].
[2013-10-29]. http: //search. mohurd. gov. cn/?tn=mohurd&lastq=%24wstquerystring%24&sort=last-modified+desc&rn=10
&auth_info=&table_id=%24wsttableid%24&pn=0&query=%u7eff%u8272%u5efa%u7b51.
MOHURD. MOHURD’ announcement about the label certification of green building evaluation from the 1st batch of
2009 to the 11th batch of 2013. [EB/OL]. [2013-10-29]. http: //search. mohurd. gov. cn/?tn=mohurd&lastq=%24wstqu
erystring%24&sort=last-modified+desc&rn=10&auth_info=&table_id=%24wsttableid%24&pn=0&query=%u7eff%u8272%u5
efa%u7b51.
[9] 田慧峰, 张欢, 孙大明, 等. 中国大陆绿色建筑发展现状及前景[J]. 建筑科学, 2012, 28(4): 1-7.
TIAN Huifeng, ZHANG Huan, SUN Daming, et al. Development status and prospect of green building in mainland china [J].
Building Science, 2012, 28(4): 1-7.
[10] YANG W, ZHANG G. Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated and air-conditioned buildings in hot summer/ cold winter climate
zone in China[J]. International Journal of Biometeorology , 2008(52): 385-398.

相似文献/References:

[1]赵敬源,黄志勇.LEED V4与《绿色建筑评价标准》的对比研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报:自然科学版,2017,49(03):408.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2017.03.015]
　ZHAO Jingyuan,HUANG Zhiyong.A Comparative study on LEED V4 and assessment standard for green building[J].J.Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.:Natural Science Edition,2017,49(02):408.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2017.03.015]
[2]张群,王钰萱,梁锐.中美绿色建筑评价标准校园体系比较与优化建议[J].西安建筑科技大学学报:自然科学版,2017,49(03):416.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2017.03.016]
　ZHANG Qun,WANG Yuxuan,LIANG Rui.Comparison and optimization suggestion for campus system of U.S. and China green building evaluation standards[J].J.Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.:Natural Science Edition,2017,49(02):416.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2017.03.016]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2013-06-24 修改稿日期：2014-04-03
基金项目：国家自然科学基金项目（51178369，51278414，51221865）；陕西省重点科技创新团队(2012KCT-11)
作者简介：张群（1973-），男，博士，教授，主要从事绿色建筑研究．E-mail: zhangqun@xauat.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-10-10