[1]姚继涛,罗张飞,程凯凯,等.既有结构可靠性评定的设计值法[J].西安建筑科技大学学报：自然版,2016,48(01):18-23.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2016.01.003]
　YAO Jitao,LUO Zhangfei,CHENG Kaikai,et al.Design value method of assessing the existing structural reliability[J].J.Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.：Natural Science Edition,2016,48(01):18-23.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2016.01.003]
点击复制

既有结构可靠性评定的设计值法()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报：自然版[ISSN:1006-7930/CN:61-1295/TU]

卷:
48
期数:
2016年01期
页码:
18-23
栏目:
出版日期:
2016-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Design value method of assessing the existing structural reliability
文章编号:
1006-7930(2016)01-0018-06
作者:
姚继涛; 罗张飞;程凯凯;李凯凯
 西安建筑科技大学土木工程学院，陕西 西安,710055
Author(s):
 YAO Jitao; LUO Zhangfei;  CHENG Kaikai; LI Kaikai
School of Civil Engineering, Xi′an Univ. of Arch. & Tech., Xi′an 710055, China
关键词:
既有结构; 可靠性评定; 分项系数法; 设计值法
Keywords:
existing structure;  reliability assessment;  Partial factors method;  design-value method
分类号:
TU311.2
DOI:
10.15986/j.1006-7930.2016.01.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目前对既有结构可靠性的评定主要采用结构可靠度设计中的校核方法，即以分项系数表达的实用设计表达式．虽然在具体的校核过程中，一般会考虑既有结构实际的材料性能、几何尺寸和所承担的作用，但这种评定方法并不完全适用于既有结构的可靠性评定．借鉴国际标准中设计值法的基本思想，在前期工作的基础上，提出既有结构可靠性评定的设计值法．该方法在可靠性评定中直接考虑了基本变量概率特性、目标可靠指标和后续使用年限变化对评定结果的影响，引用既有结构的作用和性能的最新统计结果，建立可靠性评定方法，允许业主自由选取目标可靠指标和后续使用年限，较现有的结构可靠度设计中的校核方法更具有良好的灵活性和通用性．同时，根据此方法确定了现有规范规定的既有结构构件承载能力的鉴定等级与结构构件可靠指标之间的关系．
Abstract:
Presently, the method about the assessment of the existing structure reliability mainly uses the verification method of structure reliability design, which is the practical design expression with the partial coefficient. The actual material performance, geometry and performed function of the existing structure can be taken account into the process of the specific verification. However, this assessment method is not fully applicable to assess the existing structure reliability. Thus, with the reference from the basic idea of the design value method in international standard, the design value method of assessing the existing structural reliability can be put forward on the basis of previous work. This methodology takes account directly the characteristics of the basic variable probability, target reliability index and design working life on design results into the reliability assessment. Moreover, it can also establish the method of reliability evaluation and allow owners to choose flexibly the target reliability index and design working life with citing the latest statistics of structural functions and performance. Compared with the current verification method of the reliability design, the design value method of assessing the existing structural reliability can possess more excellent flexibility and versatility. Simultaneously, this method can identify the relationship between the identification grade of the structural elements’ bearing force provided in existing specifications and the reliability index of the structural elements.

参考文献/References:

[1] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 工程结构可靠性设计统一标准: GB50153-2008[S].北京: 中国建筑工业出版, 2008.
Housing and urban-rural development of the People’s Republic of China. Unified standard for reliability design of engineering structures: GB50153-2008[S].Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press,2008.
[2] 中华人民共和国建设部. 建筑结构可靠度设计统一标准: GBJ68-84[S].北京: 中国建筑工业出版,1984. Ministry of construction of the People’s Republic of China. Unified standard for reliability design of building structures: GBJ68-84[S]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 1984.
[3] International Organization for Standardization. International Standard: General principles on reliability for structures: ISO2394:1998[S]. Switzerland: Geneve, ISO, 1998.
[4] 姚继涛, 程凯凯. 结构安全性设计的通用表达式[J].应用力学学报, 2014, 31(2): 275-281.
YAO Jitao, Cheng Kaikai. General expressions for structural safety design[J]．CHINESE JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS, 2014,31(2):275-281.
[5] International Organization for Standardization. International Standard: Bases for design of structures–Assessment of existing structures: ISO13822:2003[S]. Geneve, Switzerland: ISO, 2003.
[6] 姚继涛, 解耀魁. 结构可靠度分析中作用的随机过程组合方法[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2013, 34(2): 125-130.
YAO Jitao, XIE Yaokui. Method combination of actions based on stochastic processes in analysis of structural reliability[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2013, 34(2)：125-130.
[7] JCSS. JCSS probabilistic model code: ISBN 978-3- 909386-79-6[S]. Denmark: Copenhagen, Joint Committee on Structural Safety, 2011.
[8] 中华人民共和国建设部. 民用建筑可靠性鉴定标准: GB50292-1999[S] .北京: 中国建筑工业出版, 1999.
Ministry of construction of the People’s Republic of China. Standard for appraiser of reliability of civil engineering: GB50292-1999[S]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 1999.
[9] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 工业建筑可靠性鉴定标准: GB 50144-2008[S].北京: 中国建筑工业出版, 2008.
Housing and urban-rural development of the People’s Republic of China．Standard for appraiser of reliability of industrial buildings and structures: GB 50144-2008 [S]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2008.
[10] 李继华. 建筑结构概率极限状态设计[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 1990.
LI Jihua. Building structure probability limit state design[M]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 1990.
[11] International Organization for Standardization. International Standard: Bases for design of structures – assessment of existing structures: ISO13822:2003 [S]. International Organization for Standardization, 2003.
[12] 姚继涛. 既有结构可靠性理论及应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008.
YAO Jitao. The reliability theory and application of existing structures[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2008.
[13] 张俊芝.服役工程结构可靠性理论及其应用[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2007.
ZHANG Junzhi. The reliability theory and application of existing structures[M].Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2007.

相似文献/References:

[1]姚继涛,罗张飞.既有结构构件承载能力评定的分级标准[J].西安建筑科技大学学报：自然版,2017,49(06):784.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2017.06.003]
　YAO Jitao,LUO Zhangfei.Grading standard for carrying capacity assessment of existing structural members[J].J.Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.：Natural Science Edition,2017,49(01):784.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2017.06.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2015-05-27 修改稿日期：2016-02-17
基金项目：国家自然科学基金项目(50678143)
作者简介：姚继涛(1965－)，男，工学博士，教授，主要从事结构可靠性设计与评定，既有结构可靠性检测与加固方面研究．E-mail：yaojitao@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-04-01