[1]韩晨平,何真卓,顾贤光.建筑设计创新公共效益的有效协调特征分析[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2017,(06):890-894.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2017.06.018]
 HAN Chenping,HE Zhenzhuo,GU Xianguang.Analysis of effective coordination characteristics of public benefit in architectural design innovation[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2017,(06):890-894.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2017.06.018]
点击复制

建筑设计创新公共效益的有效协调特征分析()
分享到:

西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版)[ISSN:1006-7930/CN:61-1295/TU]

卷:
期数:
2017年06期
页码:
890-894
栏目:
出版日期:
2017-12-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of effective coordination characteristics of public benefit in architectural design innovation
文章编号:
1006-7930(2017)06-0890-05
作者:
韩晨平何真卓顾贤光
(中国矿业大学 建筑与设计学院, 江苏 徐州 221116)
Author(s):
HAN Chenping HE Zhenzhuo GU Xianguang
(School of Architecture and Design China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116,China)
关键词:
建筑设计创新公共效益信息不对称有效协调
Keywords:
architectural design innovation public benefit asymmetric information Effective coordination
分类号:
TU-05
DOI:
10.15986/j.1006-7930.2017.06.018
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
建筑设计创新作为社会活动的组成部分必然对社会公共效益产生一定的影响.在建筑设计创新活动中,由于社会、建筑投资建设者(客户)、建筑设计者三方与社会公共效益的社会结构关系不同,使得三方对社会公共效益的反应也各不相同.在建筑设计创新的过程中,如何充分兼顾与协调社会、建筑投资建设者(客户)、建筑设计者三方的各自需求及特点,使建筑设计创新创造更大的社会公共效益,是值得研究的重要问题.运用数理模型推导的方法在信息不对称的情况下,研究和揭示在建筑设计创新的公共效益中,社会、建筑投资建设者(客户)、建筑设计者三方的各自作用与可能的有效协调特征关系,可以为提高建筑设计创新的公共效益提供重要的指导建议.
Abstract:
Architectural design innovation as part of the social activities definitely has some impact on the public benefit. In architectural innovation activities,because of the different relationships of social structure between the society, construction investment builders (customer), building designers and public benefits, there are different responses to the social and public. In the process of architectural design innovation, it is important to study how to balance and coordinate the respective needs and characteristics of society, construction investment builders (customer), building designer, and how to make architectural design innovation to create greater social public benefits. In the case of asymmetric information, using the mathematical model to research and reveal the respective roles and possible effective coordination characteristic relations of the three parts of society, construction investment builders (customer), building designers in the public benefit of architectural design innovation. This provides important guidance for improving the public benefit of architectural design innovation.

参考文献/References:

[1]韩晨平. 建筑设计创新的概念浅析[J].新建筑,2015(2):102-104. HAN Chenping. A study on the concept of architectural design innovation [J]. New Architecture,2015(2): 102-104. [2]PIGOU A C. An extension of sidgwickian thought[M]. History of Political Economy II (Winter 1979): 588-605. [3]PIGOU A C. The Economics of Welfare[M]. 4th ed. London: Macmillan, 1932: 89. (Originally published in 1920). [4]庄惟敏,梁思思,王韬. 后评估在中国[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2017:3. ZHANG Weimin, LIANG Sisi, WANG Tao. Post-Occupancy Evaluation in China[M]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press,2017:3. [5]SIRINA N, HUA A, GOBERT J. What factors influence the value of an urban park within a medium-sized french conurbation[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2017, 24(2017):45. [6]韩晨平.数理经济学视角下的建筑设计创新研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2013:58. HAN Chenping. The research in architectural design innovation by mathematical economic perspective[D]. Harbin Institute of Technology, 2013:58. [7]AKERLOF GA. The market for lemons: qualitative uncertainty and the mechanism[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics , 1970(84): 488-500. [8]张德群,关柯.建筑信息模型及信息不对称分析[J].哈尔滨建筑大学学报,2000,33(4):93-95. ZHANG Dequn, GUAN Ke. Study on information model of construction industry and asymmetric information[J]. Journal of Harbin University of C. E. & Architecture, 2000,33(4):93-95. [9]STIGLER G J. The economics of information [J]. Journal of Political Economy 1961(69): 213-225. [10]MUTH J F. Rational expectations and the theory of price movements[J].Econometric, 1961, 29(3): 315-335. [11]GAREN I E. Executive compensation and principalagent theory[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1994(102): 1175-1199. [12]ARROW K. Essays in the theory of risk-bearing[M]. Amsterdam: NorthHolland, 1970. [13]PRATT J. Risk aversion in the small and in the large[J]. Econometrica, 1964, 32: 122-136.

相似文献/References:

[1]韩晨平,邹广天.建筑设计创新适合策略的数理推导与相关结论[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2013,(02):257.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2013.02.017]
 HAN Chen-ping,ZOU Guang-tian.Mathematical economic view of the decorum strategy on architectural design innovation[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2013,(06):257.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2013.02.017]
[2]韩晨平.建筑设计创新生成能力的数理分析[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2014,(01):109.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2014.01.019]
 HAN Chenping.A mathematical analysis about the generation capability of architectural design innovation[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2014,(06):109.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2014.01.019]
[3]王科奇.可拓建筑设计创新初探[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2011,(05):672.[doi:DOI :10.15986/j .1006-7930.2011.05.026]
 WANG K e-qi,ZOU Guang-t ian.Innovation on the extension architectural design[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2011,(06):672.[doi:DOI :10.15986/j .1006-7930.2011.05.026]
[4]韩晨平,王 栋,顾贤光,等.建筑设计创新的外部有效激励与监管分析[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2016,(01):133.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2016.01.022]
 HAN Chenping,WANG Dong,GU Xianguang,et al.Analysis of external effective incentive and supervision in architectural design innovation[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2016,(06):133.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2016.01.022]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2015-03-07 修改稿日期:2017-11-20 基金项目:中国矿业大学学科基础建设项目 第一作者:韩晨平(1968-),男,博士,教授,主要从事建筑设计及其理论的实践与研究工作. E-mail:hanchenping@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-02-12