[1]付晓萌,王新文.基于S-CAD法的大明宫大遗址地区更新规划评估研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2022,54(06):864-872.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2022.06.009 ]
　FU Xiaomeng,WANG Xinwen.Research on urban renewal planning evaluation in Daming Palace area based on S-CAD analysis method[J].J. Xi'an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2022,54(06):864-872.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2022.06.009 ]
点击复制

基于S-CAD法的大明宫大遗址地区更新规划评估研究()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（自然科学版）[ISSN:1006-7930/CN:61-1295/TU]

卷:
54
期数:
2022年06期
页码:
864-872
栏目:
西部“一带一路”沿线城镇绿色更新发展
出版日期:
2022-12-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on urban renewal planning evaluation in Daming Palace area based on S-CAD analysis method
文章编号:
1006-7930(2022)06-0864-09
作者:
付晓萌; 王新文
(西安建筑科技大学 建筑学院,陕西 西安 710055)
Author(s):
FU Xiaomeng;  WANG Xinwen
(School of Architecture, Xi'an Univ. of Arch. & Tech., Xi'an 710055, China)
关键词:
城市更新;  规划评估;  城市遗址区;  S-CAD分析法;  西北地区;  大明宫地区
Keywords:
urban renewal;  planning evaluation;  urban heritage area;  S-CAD analysis method;  Northwest China;  Daming Palace area
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.15986/j.1006-7930.2022.06.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
多元利益主体的博弈是困扰当前城市更新工作的难题,尤其对于西北地区而言,城市规划工作尚处于“增量”向“存量”转型初期,城市大遗址区的保护与更新矛盾较为突出,采用合适的决策分析工具化解其中的社会风险具有重要意义.规划方案作为相关利益主体价值观的直接体现,应在规划评估中予以重视.基于城乡规划的公共政策属性,采用S-CAD政策评估方法,发挥其具有鲜明理性逻辑及便于平衡各方诉求的特点,对大明宫地区的保护与改造总体规划进行分析,从主导观点和相关观点的不同立场对该规划的实施效应、效率和可行性进行评估,进而为大明宫地区的城市更新品质提升工作提供相关建议,以期为我国西北地区的城市遗址区的更新工作提供借鉴.
Abstract:
The game of multiple stakeholders is a difficult problem puzzling the current urban renewal work. Especially for the northwest region, the urban planning work is still in the initial stage of the transition from “increment” to “stock”, and the contradiction between the protection and renewal of the large urban heritage sites is more prominent, so it is of great significance to adopt appropriate decision-making analysis tools to resolve the social risks. As the direct embodiment of the values of the relevant stakeholders, the planning scheme should be paid attention to in the planning evaluation. Based on the public policy attribute of urban and rural planning, the S-CAD policy evaluation method, which has the characteristics of distinct rational logic and is easy to balance the demands of all parties, is adopted to analyze the overall planning of the protection and renovation of Daming Palace area, The implementation effect, efficiency and feasibility of the plan are evaluated from the different positions of the leading point of view and the relevant point of view, so as to provide relevant suggestions for the improvement of urban renewal quality in Daming Palace area, so as to provide reference for the renewal of urban heritage sites in Northwest China.

参考文献/References:

[1]杨豪中, 王劲.以有机更新的方式应对大规模城中村改造规划[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2011,43(2):260-265.
YANG Haozhong, WANG Jing. On performing large-scale reconstruction of urban villages in the manner of organic renewal[J]. J. of Xi'an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition), 2011, 43(2):260-265.
[2]朱永,司南.多维视角下深圳城市更新空间特征研究——以2010—2016年城市更新单元样本为例[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2020,52(3):439-446,462.
ZHU Yong, SI Nan. Multi-perspective study on spatial features of urban renewal practice in Shenzhen based on urban renewal units between 2010—2016[J]. J. of Xi'an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition), 2020,52(3): 439-446, 462.
[3]陈同滨.城镇化背景下的中国大遗址保护[J].建设科技,2006(22):58-61.
CHEN Tongbin. The protection of China's great heritage sites under the background of urbanization[J]. Construction Science and Technology, 2006(22):58-61.
[4]单霁翔.论中国大型古代城市遗址的整体保护[J].东南文化,2009(2):7-15.
SHAN Jixiang. On the overall conservation of Chinese ancient large-scale city-sites[J]. Southeast Culture, 2009(2):7-15.
[5]崔明,朱光亚.江苏省大遗址保护规划浅析[J].文博,2006(6):65-69.
CUI Ming, ZHU Guangya. Analysis on the protection planning of large sites in Jiangsu province[J]. Relics and Museolgy, 2006(6):65-69.
[6]冉淑青,裴成荣.城市空间发展与大遗址保护协调性研究——以西安为例[J].现代城市研究,2014,29(11):92-96.
RAN Shuqing, PEI Cheng-rong. Research on the coordination of city space development and conservation of big cultural Site: A case study of Xi'an[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2014, 29(11):92-96.
[7]王新文,张沛,张中华.城市更新视域下大明宫遗址区空间生产实践检讨及优化策略研究[J].城市发展研究,2017,24(2):125-128.
WANG Xinwen, ZHANG Pei, ZHANG Zhonghua. Production practice and optimization strategy research of Daming Palace ruins area space in the urban renewal horizon[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2017, 24(2):125-128.
[8]付晓萌,张沛.大明宫遗址区空间演化机制与规划提升策略[J].规划师,2020,36(1):47-51.
FU Xiaomeng, ZHANG Pei. Spatial evolution mechanism and planning strategy of Daming Palace site area[J].Planners, 2020, 36(1):47-51.
[9]丁新军,阙维民,孙怡.“地方性”与城市工业遗产适应性再利用研究——以英国曼彻斯特凯瑟菲尔德城市遗产公园为例[J].城市发展研究,2014,21(11):67-72.
DING Xinjun, QUE Weimin, SUN Yi. “Placeness” and urban industrial heritage adaptive reuse: A case study of Manchester Castlefield urban heritage park in britain[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2014, 21(11):67-72.
[10]吕琳,吕仁义,周庆华.中国大遗址问题研究评析与展望[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2012,44(4):517-522,540.
LÜ Lin, LÜ Renyi, ZHOU Qinghua. Comparative analysis of economic efficiency on different combined process of constructed wetland[J].J. of Xi'an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition), 2012, 44(4):517-522,540.
[11]单霁翔.文化遗产保护与城市建设[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009.
SHAN Jixiang. Cultural heritage protection and urban construction[M]. Beijing: China Architecture Press, 2009.
[12]梁鹤年,丁进锋. 政策规划与评估方法: Towards a subjective approach to policy planning & evaluation: common-sense structured [M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2009.
LIANG Henian, DING Jinfeng. Policy planning & evaluation: Towards a subjective approach to policy planning & evaluation: common sense structured [M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2009.
[13]梁鹤年.政策分析[J].城市规划,2004(11):78-85.
LIANG Henian. Policy analysis[J]. City Planning Review, 2004(11):78-85.
[14]李冬雪,王兴平,柏露露,等.S-CAD政策评估方法在城乡规划评估中的应用研究[J].国际城市规划,2020,35(5):114-123.
LI Dongxue, WANG Xingping, BAI Lulu, et al. Application of S-CAD approach in urban-rural planning evaluation[J]. Urban Planning International, 2020, 35(5):114-123.
[15]马海群,冯畅.基于S-CAD方法的国家信息政策评估研究[J].情报学报,2018,37(10):1060-1076.
MA Haiqun, FENG Chang. Research on national information policy assessment based on the S-CAD method[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2018, 37(10):1060-1076.
[16]王志锋,徐晓明,谢天成,等.基于S-CAD方法的农村土地制度改革试点政策评估:以义乌为例[J].公共管理评论,2017(3):66-91.
WANG Zhifeng, XU Xiaoming, XIE Tiancheng, et al. Evaluation of pilot policies of rural land system reform based on S-CAD method: Taking Yiwu as an example[J]. China Public Administration Review, 2017(3):66-91.
[17]董昊鑫,赵惠.基于S-CAD方法的新能源汽车推广应用政策研究[J].现代管理科学,2017(12):76-78.
DONG Haoxin, ZHAO Hui. Research on promotion and application policy of new energy vehicles based on S-CAD method[J]. Modern Management Science, 2017(12):76-78.
[18]刘润秋,黄志兵.基于S-CAD方法的宅基地退出试点政策评估——以成都市为例[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021(5):138-147.
LIU Runqiu, HUANG Zhibing. An evaluation on pilot policy of withdrawal from rural homesteads based on S-CAD method: A case of Chengdu,Sichuan province[J]. Journal of Sichuan University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2021(5):138-147.
[19]郭谌达,周俭,梁鹤年.基于S-CAD评估方法的遗产保护区保护政策分析——以加拿大金斯顿《巴瑞菲尔德遗产保护区新计划》为例[J/OL].国际城市规划,2022:1-26.http://libin-443.webvpn.2stu.edu.cn/asset/detail1012031092130949.
GUO Chenda, ZHOU Jian, LIANG Henian. Analysis and inspiration of heritage conservation district protection policy based on S-CAD: Taking as “the new village of barrie field heritage conservation district(HCD)plan” in Kingston, Canada [J/OL]. Urban Planning International, 2022: 1-26.http://libin-443.webvpn.2stu.edu.cn/asset/detail1012031092130949.
[20]王昊,马睿,肖攀,等.基于S-CAD方法的不动产统一登记制度评估研究[J].城市发展研究,2021,28(10):12-16,22.
WANG Hao, MA Rui, XIAO PAN, et al. Research on the evaluation of unified real estate registration system based on s-CAD method[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2021, 28(10):12-16,22.
[21]康晓琳,梁鹤年,施祖麟.透过S-CAD分析框架回顾土地垂直管理政策[J].中国土地科学,2014,28(6):51-57.
KANG Xiaolin, LIANG Henian, SHI Zulin. Review of vertical land management and introduction of an analysis framework[J]. China Land Science, 2014, 28(6):51-57.
[22]吴冲,余压芳,王思成.城市大遗址保护利用对周边商品住宅价格影响机制研究——以汉长安城大遗址为例[J].资源开发与市场,2021,37(6):716-725.
WU Chong, YU Yafang, WANG Sicheng. The impact mechanism of the protection and utilization of urban great relics on the surrounding commodity housing price taking the great relics of Han Chang'an City as an example[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2021, 37(6):716-725.
[23]张定青,赵一青,竺剡瑶.城市遗址保护与利用的多元价值实现路径——以西安城区为例[J].现代城市研究,2022(7):120-126.
ZHANG Dingqing, ZHAO Yiqing, ZHU Shanyao. Multi-value paths of urban heritage site conservation and utilization: A case study of X i'an city[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2022(7):120-126.
[24]王晓敏,李帆,王新文.城市化进程中的文化遗产保护浅析:以历史文化名城西安为例[J].华中建筑,2013,31(3):144-148.
WANG Xiaomin, LI Fan, WANG Xinwen. The cultural heritage protection in the process of urbanization: The historic city of Xi'an as an example[J]. Huazhong Architecture, 2013, 31(3):144-148.
[25]王新文,吕正平.国际遗产保护经验对西安遗产保护事业的启示[J]. 丝绸之路,2010(24):112-116.
WANG Xinwen, LÜ Zhengping. Enlightenment of international heritage protection experience on Xi'an heritage protection[J]. The Silk Road, 2010(24):112-116.
[26]朱菁,艾继国. 试论城市空间特色保护及其再塑[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版),2008,38(2):301-304.
ZHU Jing, AI Jiguo. A study on the spatial characteristics special landscape sand present problems of city[J]. Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition), 2008,38(2):301-304.
[27]张馨,裴成荣.大遗址片区的特色生态城市建设研究——以西安市为例[J].生态经济,2018,34(5):160-165.
ZHANG Xin, PEI Chengrong. Study on the construction of the special Eco-city in great sites area: A case study of Xi'an[J]. Ecological Economy, 2018, 34(5):160-165.
[28]苏卉,孙晶磊.城市化进程中文化遗址的保护与适应性开发研究——以唐大明宫遗址为例[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2016,35(5):48-51,62.
SU Hui, SUN Jinglei. A research on the preservation and the adaptive development of historical and cultural heritage in the course of urbanization:Taking Daming Palace of Tang Dynasty as an example[J].J. of Xi'an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Social Science Edition),2016,35(5):48-51,62.
[29]刘吉发.大遗址区文化资源活化与保护理念创新——《大遗址区文化资源的价值评估及活化策略》书评[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,39(4):101.
LIU Jifa. Innovation in the concept of activating and protecting cultural resources in the great site area:A review of the book evaluation and activating strategy of cultural resources in the great site area[J]. J. of Xi'an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Social Science Edition), 2020, 39(4):101.
[30]刘卫红.田园城市视域下的汉长安城遗址保护利用模式研究[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),2017,47(2):283-288.
LIU Weihong. The protection and sustainable development model of Han Chang'an City based on the theory of garden city[J]. Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 47(2):283-288.
[31]赵冠宁,黄卫东,李晨,等.从“刚性计划”到“韧性计划”:深圳城市更新计划管理的制度选择[J].规划师,2022,38(9):31-39.
ZHAO Guanning, HUANG Weidong, LI Chen, et al. From “rigid program” to “resilient program”: Institutional comparison of urban regeneration programming, Shenzhen[J]. Planners, 2022, 38(9):31-39.
[32]刘昭,黄曦宇,李青香,等.面向过程治理的城市体检评估框架与协同研究[J].规划师,2022,38(3):20-27.
LIU Zhao, HUANG Xiyu, LI Qingxiang, et al. Research on the Framework and Integration of Urban Physical Examination for Process Governance[J]. Planners, 2022, 38(3):20-27.

相似文献/References:

[1]王　涛１,２,陈丽华３,等.速度化背景下城市街道绿化整治规划类型学方法应用研究———以渭南街道绿化整治规划模式图法为例[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2011,43(06):892.[doi:DOI:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2011.06.021]
　,,et al.Ｒｅｓｅａｒｃｈ　ｏｎ　ｕｓｉｎｇ　ｃｉｔｙ　ｔｙｐｏｌｏｇｉｃａｌ　ｍｅｔｈｏｄｓ　ｉｎ　ｔｈｅ　ｃｉｔｙ’ｓｓｔｒｅｅｔ　ｇｒｅｅｎｉｎｇ　ｒｅｎｏｖａｔｉｏｎ　ｐｌａｎ　ｕｎｄｅｒ　ｔｈｅ　ｓｐｅｅｄ　ｂａｃｋｇｒｏｕｎｄ———Ｔａｋｉｎｇ　ｒｅｆｅｒｅｎｃｅ　ｄｒａｗｉｎｇｓ　ｕｓｅｄ　ｉｎ　ｗｅｉｎａｎ　ｃｉｔｙｌｓ　ｓｔｒｅｅｔ　ｇｒｅｅｎｉｎｇｒｅｎｏｖａｔｉｏｎ　ｐｌａｎ　ａｓ　ａｎ　ｅｘａｍｐｌｅ[J].J. Xi'an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2011,43(06):892.[doi:DOI:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2011.06.021]
[2]朱 永,司 南.多维视角下深圳城市更新空间特征研究——以2010-2016年城市更新单元样本为例[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2020,52(03):439.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2020.03.019]
　ZHU Yong,SI Nan.Multi-perspective study on spatial features of urban renewal practice in Shenzhen based on urban renewal units between 2010 & 2016[J].J. Xi'an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2020,52(06):439.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2020.03.019]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-11-10修改稿日期:2022-11-20
基金项目:中国工程院战略研究与咨询项目(2022-XZ-38)
第一作者:付晓萌(1995—),女,博士生,研究方向为城乡规划.E-mail:707561728@qq.com
通信作者:王新文(1974—),男,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为城乡规划、城市遗产保护.E-mail:284917006@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-12-28