[1]强生银,王宏伟,温瑞智,等.2021年云南漾濞地震序列中强(MS≥5.0)地震强震动特征[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2023,55(02):242-248.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2023.02.012 ]
 QIANG Shengyin,WANG Hongwei,WEN Ruizhi,et al.Strong-motion characteristics in moderate-to-strong(MS≥5.0)earthquakes of the 2021 Yangbi Yunnan earthquake sequence[J].J. Xi'an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2023,55(02):242-248.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2023.02.012 ]
点击复制

2021年云南漾濞地震序列中强(MS≥5.0)地震强震动特征()
分享到:

西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版)[ISSN:1006-7930/CN:61-1295/TU]

卷:
55
期数:
2023年02期
页码:
242-248
栏目:
出版日期:
2023-04-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Strong-motion characteristics in moderate-to-strong(MS≥5.0)earthquakes of the 2021 Yangbi Yunnan earthquake sequence
文章编号:
1006-7930(2023)02-0242-07
作者:
强生银12王宏伟12温瑞智12任叶飞12崔建文3
(1.中国地震局工程力学研究所地震工程与工程振动重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080; 2.地震灾害防治应急管理部重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080; 3.云南省地震局,云南 昆明 650224)
Author(s):
QIANG Shengyin12 WANG Hongwei12 WEN Ruizhi12REN Yefei12CUI Jianwen3
(1.Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China; 2.Key Laboratory of Earthquake Disaster Mitigation, Ministry of Emergency Management, Harbin 150080, China; 3.Yunnan Earthquake Agency, Kunming 650224, China)
关键词:
漾濞地震序列强震动特征破裂方向性震源效应、非弹性衰减
Keywords:
Yangbi earthquake sequence strong-motion characteristic source rupture directivity source effects anelastic attenuation
分类号:
P315.9
DOI:
10.15986/j.1006-7930.2023.02.012
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
2021年云南漾濞地震序列包括4次MS≥5.0中强地震(MS5.6前震、MS6.4主震、MS5.0和MS5.2余震),这四次中强地震中强震动台站和地震烈度速报台共获得强震动记录近千组,尤其近场记录,这些记录为分析强震动特征提供了良好契机.本文选取550组高质量的强震动记录,经过严格的记录数据处理后,采用插值方法给出了MS6.4主震峰值地面加速度(PGA)和峰值地面速度(PGV)的空间分布,空间分布受震源破裂方向性和局部场地效应的影响,利用破裂方向性系数Cd表示震源破裂方向性相关的强震动峰值参数的方位角相关性,反演给出了四次地震的震源破裂方向性特征,其中MS6.4主震为沿NNW-SSE走向的双向非对称破裂事件,优势破裂方向为SSE,在优势破裂方向上的破裂约占整个破裂长度的85%.将四次地震PGA、5%阻尼比拟加速度反应谱(PSA)与ASK14预测模型的预测中位值进行对比,事件间残差均为负值,表明四次漾濞中强地震中地震动的震源效应相对较弱,短周期地震动的震源效应可能与地震类型相关,震源效应MS5.6前震>MS6.4主震>MS5.2余震,事件间残差随距离增大呈上升趋势,表明漾濞地震发震区及附近区域的非弹性衰减相对较弱.
Abstract:
The 2021 Ynagbi, Yunnan earthquake sequence consists of four moderate-to-large earthquakes with MS≥ 5.0, i.e., the MS5.6 foreshock, MS6.4 mainshock, MS5.0 and MS5.2 aftershock.In the four events, the strong-motion and seismic intensity stations totally obtained about 1000 free-field three-component strong-motion recordings, which provided excellent chance for investigating strong-motion characteristics.In this paper, 550 sets of high quality strong motion records are selected.After rigorous processing of the recorded data,the spatial distribution of peak ground acceleration(PGA )and peak ground velocity(PGV )of MS6.4 main shock are given by interpolation method.The spatial distribution is affected by the rupture directivity and local site effect.The source rupture directivity coefficient Cd is utilized to represent the dependency of strong-motion peak parameters on the azimuth, and the parameters of source rupture directivity are estimated for the four Yangbi events.The MS6.4 mainshock is a bidirectional asymmetric rupture event along the NNW-SSE direction.The dominant rupture direction is SSE, and the rupture in the dominant rupture direction accounts for about 85% of the total rupture length.Comparing the predicted median values of the four earthquakes PGA, 5% damping psedu-acceleration response spectrum(PSA )and the ASK14 prediction model, the residuals between events are negative, indicating that the source effect of ground motion in the four Yangbi moderate-strong earthquakes is relatively weak.The source effects on short-period ground motions approximately show the dependence on earthquake type, i.e., MS5.6 foreshock >MS6.4 mainshock>MS5.2 aftershock.The increasing trend of inter-event residuals with the increasing distance indicates the weaker anelastic attenuations in the study region than those described by the ASK14 model.

参考文献/References:

[1] 徐锡伟,闻学泽,郑荣章,等.川滇地区活动块体最新构造变动样式及其动力来源[J].中国科学(D辑), 2003, 33(S1): 151-162.
XU Xiwei, WEN Xueze, ZHENG Rongzhang, et al.Pattern of latest tectonic motion and its dynamics for active blocks in Sichuan-Yunnan region, China[J].Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 2003, 33(S1): 151-162.
[2]常祖峰,常昊,臧阳,等.维西—乔后断裂新活动特征及其与红河断裂的关系[J].地质力学学报,2016,22(3):517-530.
CHANG Zufeng, CHANG Hao, ZANG Yang, et al.Recent active features of weixi-qiaohou fault and its relationship with the honghe fault[J].Journal of Geomechanics, 2016,22(3):517-530.
[3]龙锋,祁玉萍,易桂喜,等.2021年5月21日云南漾濞MS6.4地震序列重新定位与发震构造分析[J].地球物理学报,2021,64(8):2631-2646.
LONG Feng, QI Yuping, YI Guixi, et al.2021.Relocation of the MS6.4 Yangbi earthquake sequence on May 21, 2021 in Yunnan Province and its seismogenic structure analysis[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2021, 64(8): 2631-2646.
[4]段梦乔,赵翠萍,周连庆,等.2021年5月21日云南漾濞MS6.4地震序列发震构造[J].地球物理学报,2021,64(9):3111-3125.
DUAN Mengqiao, ZHAO Cuiping, ZHOU Lianqing, et al.2021.Seismogenic structure of the 21 May 2021MS6.4 Yunnan Yangbi earthquake sequence[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2021, 64(9): 3111-3125.
[5]WANG Hongwei,WEN Ruizhi.Attenuation and basin amplification revealed by thedense ground motions of the 12 July 2020 MS5.1 Tangshan, China, Earthquake[J].Seismological Research Letters, 2021,92(4), 2109-2121.
[6]ABRAHAMSON N A,SILVA W J.Empirical response spectral attenuationrelations for shallow crustal earthquakes[J].Seismological Research Letters, 1997,68(1):94-127.
[7]SMITH WH F, WESSEL P.Gridding with continuous curvature splines intension[J].Geophysics, 1990,55(3): 293-305.
[8]WEN Ruizhi, WANG Hongwei, REN Yefei.Rupture directivity from strong-motion recordings of the 2013 Lushan aftershocks[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2015,105(6): 3068-3082.
[9]俞言祥, 李山有, 肖亮.为新区划图编制所建立的地震动衰减关系[J].震灾防御技术, 2013, 8(1): 24-33.
YU Yanxiang, LI Shanyou, XIAO Liang.Development of ground motion attenuation relations for the new seismic hazard map of China[J].Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2013, 8(1): 24-33.
[10]李小军.地震动参数区划图场地条件影响调整[J].岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(S2): 21-29.
LI Xiaojun.Adjustment of seismic ground motion parameters considering site effects in seismic zonation map[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(S2): 21-29.
[11]吕红山,赵凤新.适用于中国场地分类的地震动反应谱放大系数[J].地震学报, 2007, 29(1): 67-76.
LYU Hongshan, ZHAO Fengxin.Site coefficients suitable to China site category[J].Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2007, 29(1): 67-76.
[12]HEATH D, WALD D J, WORDEN C B, et al.A global hybrid VS30 map with a topographic slope-based default and regional map insets[J].Earthquake Spectra, 2020, 36(3): 1570-1584.
[13]ABRAHAMSON N A, SILVA W J, KAMAI R.Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal region[J].Earthquake Spectra, 2014, 30(3): 1025-1055.
[14]杨九元, 温扬茂, 许才军.2021年5月21日云南漾濞MS6.4地震:一次破裂在隐伏断层上的浅源走滑事件[J].地球物理学报, 2021, 64(9): 3101-3110.
YANG Jiuyuan, WEN Yangmao, XU Caijun.The 21 May 2021 MS6.4 Yangbi(Yunnan)earthquake: A shallow strike-slip event rupturing in a blind fault[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2021, 64(9): 3101-3110.
[15]AL Atik L, ABRAHAMSON N, BOMMER J J, et al.The variability of ground-motion prediction models and its components[J].Seismological Research Letters, 2010, 81(5): 794-801.
[16]BALTAY A S, HANKS T C, ABRAHAMSON N A.Earthquake stress drop and Arias intensity[J].Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth,2019, 124(4): 3838-3852.
[17]MOYER P A, BOETTCHER M S, MCGUIRE J J, et al.Spatial and temporal variations in earthquake stress drop on gofar transform fault, east pacific rise: implications for fault strength[J].Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth,2018, 123(9): 7722-7740.
[18]WANG Hongwei, WEN Ruizhi.Earthquake source characteristics and S-wave propagation attenuation in the junction of the northwest tarim basin and kepingtage fold-and-thrust zone[J].Frontiers in Earth Science, 2020, 8: 567939.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-07-11修改稿日期:2023-02-21
基金项目:中国地震局工程力学研究所基本科研业务费专项资助项目(2020C05)
第一作者:强生银(1995—),男,博士生,主要从事工程地震研究. E-mail: qiangsy_96@outlook.com
通信作者:王宏伟(1990—),男, 博士,副研究员,主要从事地震动特征及预测研究. E-mail: whw1990413@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-04-20