西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版)

历史文化风貌区并非我国法定保护层次,在快速城镇化发展过程中,往往遭到市场资本的“蚕食”,在各种更新、改造的名义下慢慢消失.随着我国城市发展逐渐从增量规划转变到存量优化的新常态背景下,历史文化风貌区保护开始受到关注,保护方法成为热点.针对历史文化风貌区建筑更新改造方式较随意、缺乏科学依据的现实,通过梳理和借鉴国内外历史建筑评价指标体系,建立了基于多重目标和多元价值导向的历史文化风貌区建筑定量评价指标体系,并以寸滩历史文化风貌区保护案例进行建筑定量化评价实证检验.结果表明:历史风貌区建筑保护需要考虑风貌区发展的可能性、居民生存环境的改进、对周边区域的带动作用等等多重目标与多元化的价值取向; 历史风貌区保护规划中,对于大多数建筑的评价,更注重现实经济价值、使用价值和实施性.研究结论对于提高历史文化风貌区建筑更新改造方式的科学性、客观性具有重要意义.

Historical and cultural feature area, not a legal protected a rea in China, in the process of rapid urbanization, used to been eroded by the market capital. That slowly disappeared under the name of various renovation. With the gradually change of urban development from incremental planning to the new normal background of stock optimization, the protection of historical and cultural feature area has become a hot topic. According to the reality of casual and unscientific building renovation in the historical and cultural area, the paper believes that the multi-value orientation is an important way to guarantee the scientific and objective protection of the historical and cultural area. By combining and drawing lessons from the domestic and foreign historical building evaluation index system, the paper establishes the building quantitative evaluation index system based on the multiple goals and multiple values orientation, and this evaluation is carried out with the case of Cuntan. The results indicate that the construction protection of historical feature area needs to take into account the possibility of the development of the landscape area, the improvement of the living environment of residents, the driving effect of the surrounding area, etc., and the value orientation of multiple goals and multiple values. In the protection plan of historical feature area, the evaluation of most buildings pays more attention to the use value and practicability of realistic economic value. The research conclusion is of great significance to improve the scientific objectivity of the renovation of historic cultural features.

引言
1 基于多重目标与多元平衡的评价方法体系建构
2 寸滩历史风貌区建筑基础数据调研及评价
4 结论与讨论

图1 历史街区建筑价值的关键要素<br/>Fig.1 Key elements of historic district building value

图1 历史街区建筑价值的关键要素
Fig.1 Key elements of historic district building value

图2 多重目标与多元综合价值评价体系<br/>Fig.2 Multivariate comprehensive value evaluation system

图2 多重目标与多元综合价值评价体系
Fig.2 Multivariate comprehensive value evaluation system

表1 指标比较标准值<br/>Tab.1 Standard value of the indicator

表1 指标比较标准值
Tab.1 Standard value of the indicator

表2 评价项目指标层(A层)判断矩阵<br/>Tab.3 Judgment matrix of Layer A

表2 评价项目指标层(A层)判断矩阵
Tab.3 Judgment matrix of Layer A

表3 评价项目因子层(C层)判断结果<br/>Tab.3 Judging results of Layer C

表3 评价项目因子层(C层)判断结果
Tab.3 Judging results of Layer C

表4 建筑价值评价内容<br/>Tab.4 Value evaluation of buildings

表4 建筑价值评价内容
Tab.4 Value evaluation of buildings

表5 指标标准化处理<br/>Tab.5 Standardization of indicators

表5 指标标准化处理
Tab.5 Standardization of indicators

图3 建筑编号图<br/>Fig.3 Building numbering diagram

图3 建筑编号图
Fig.3 Building numbering diagram

表6 建筑价值得分汇总表<br/>Tab.6 Building value score

表6 建筑价值得分汇总表
Tab.6 Building value score

图4 评价结果数据分布<br/>Fig.4 The evaluation results data

图4 评价结果数据分布
Fig.4 The evaluation results data

图5 数据变化曲线图
Fig.5 Variation curve

图6 百分比堆砌曲线图<br/>Fig.6 Percentage piling chart

图6 百分比堆砌曲线图
Fig.6 Percentage piling chart

[1] COETERIER J F. Lay people's evaluation of historic sites[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2002, 59(2): 111-123.
[2] WANG H J, ZENG Z T. A multi-objective decision-making process for reuse selection of historic buildings [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(2): 1241-1249.
[3] YÜCEER H, I·PEKOGLU B. An architectural assessment method for new exterior additions to historic buildings [J]. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2012, 13(4): 419-425.
[4] KUTUT V, ZAVADSKAS E K, LAZAUSKAS M. Assessment of priority alternatives for preservation of historic buildings using model based on ARAS and AHP methods[J]. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 14(2): 287-294.
[5] STENDEBAKKEN M O G, GRYTLI E R, OLSSON N O E. Proposed aspects for evaluation of the value of spaces in historic buildings[J]. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2015, 21: 23-31.
[6] ASCIONE F, CHECHE N, DE MASI R F, et al. Design the refurbishment of historic buildings with the cost-optimal metho-dology: The case study of a XV century Italian building[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2015, 99: 162-176.
[7] BOARIN P, GUGLIELMINO D, PISELLO A L, et al. Sustainability assessment of historic buildings: lesson learnt from an Italian case study through LEED? rating system[J]. Energy Procedia, 2014, 61: 1029-1032.
[8] 吴铮争, 赵荣. 关于历史建筑的 “修旧如旧”:兼论陕北明长城保护中的 “修旧如旧”[J]. 城市问题, 2014(2): 36-40.
[9] 赵彦, 陆伟, 齐昊聪. 基于规划实践的历史建筑再利用研究:以美国芝加哥为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 2013, 20(2): 18-22.
[10]温日琨, 丁烈云.基于FCA的近代建筑文化价值分级评价研究[J].四川建筑,2001,21(3):17-20.
[11]余慧,刘晓.基于灰色聚类法的历史建筑综合价值评价[J].四川建筑科学研究,2009,35(5):240-242.
[12]赖明华,王晓鸣,罗爱道.基于正交设计的历史建筑综合价值评价研究[J]. 华中科技大学学报(城市科学版),2006,23(1):35-38.
[13]翟斌庆. 香港历史地段 “再生” 案例的可持续性评价[J].华中建筑, 2015, 33(3): 11-15.
[14]PENI?A M, SVETLANA G, MURGUL V. Revitalization of historic buildings as an approach to preserve cultural and historical heritage[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2015, 117: 888-895.
[15]黄瓴.城市空间文化结构研究:以西南地域城市为例[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2011.

备注

引言

1 基于多重目标与多元平衡的评价方法体系建构

2 寸滩历史风貌区建筑基础数据调研及评价

4 结论与讨论

期刊信息