[1]李金和,郝建斌.基坑锚杆脱粘风险的事故树分析[J].西安建筑科技大学学报:自然科学版,2014,46(01):71-75.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2014.01.013]
　LI Jinhe,HAO Jianbin.Debonding risk analysis of anchors in excavation engineering based on fault tree[J].J.Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.:Natural Science Edition,2014,46(01):71-75.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2014.01.013]
点击复制

基坑锚杆脱粘风险的事故树分析()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报:自然科学版[ISSN:1006-7930/CN:61-1295/TU]

卷:
46
期数:
2014年01期
页码:
71-75
栏目:
出版日期:
2014-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Debonding risk analysis of anchors in excavation engineering based on fault tree
文章编号:
1006-7930(2014)01-0071-05
作者:
李金和; 郝建斌
(长安大学地质工程与测绘学院,陕西 西安 710054)
Author(s):
LI Jinhe;  HAO Jianbin
(School of Geology Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an UniversityXi’an 710054, China)
关键词:
基坑锚杆工程; 事故树分析; 底事件概率; 敏感性分析
Keywords:
foundation trench anchor project;  fault tree analysis;  probability of bottom event;  sensitivity analysis
分类号:
TU94+2；X947
DOI:
10.15986/j.1006-7930.2014.01.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
根据事故树分析原理，构造了基坑锚杆支护结构脱粘的事故树图；提出了将专家统计的失事基坑工程频率与级差概率相结合来确定基本事件概率；在确定最小割集的基础上，进行了顶事件概率的计算；最后通过敏感性分析，对各基本事件的敏感性进行排序，揭示基本事件对于顶事件的贡献程度．分析结果表明，基坑锚杆支护结构脱粘的概率为0.180 64；土层锚杆脱粘失效对锚固段长度最为敏感；“预应力施加过早过大”、“砂浆配比不合理”、“灌浆方式不合理”、“浆体密实度不足”、“锚固体表面积过小”、“荷载过大”等几个基本事件的敏感系数排序靠前，在基坑锚杆的设计与施工过程中，必须引起足够重视．
Abstract:
According to analysis theory of fault tree, the fault tree diagram of retaining structure system with anchors is established， and the method put forward to combine wrecking foundation trench project statistical frequency inquired by experts and differential probability to determine probability method of the bottom event. Based on confirming minimum cutset, the probability of top events is calculated. In the end, through sensitivity analysis, sensibilities of various basic events are sequenced to reveal contribution degree from basic events to the top event. It is shown from the analytic result that the debond probability of foundation trench bolting structure is 0.180 64 and the earth anchor debond invalidation is sensitive to length of the anchorage segment. basic events such as "too early and oversize application of pre-stress", "unreasonable mixture ratio of mortar", "unreasonable grouting mode", "insufficient mortar compactness", "less anchorage surface area", "oversize load", etc moved to the top. During design and construction process of earth anchor, attention to these problems has to be paid.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陈赟. 工程风险管理[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2008.

CHEN Bin. Project risk management[M]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2008.

[2] 汪班桥. 土层锚杆常见病害破坏机理及防治技术研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2010.

WANG Banqiao. Study of failure mechanism and control measures on anchors’ common diseases in clay [D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2010.

[3] WANG J C, HOU W H, WANG X Z. Analysis of accident and risk sources factors for deep foundation pit[J]. Progress in Safety Science and Technology, 2005 (5): 476-481.

[4] 张建. FTA 分析方法在基坑工程中的应用研究[J]. 铁道建筑, 2009(2): 74-76.

ZHANG Jian. Study on application of FTA (Fault Tree Analysis) method to foundation pit engineering [J]. Railway Architecture, 2009(2): 74-76.

[5] 龙小梅, 陈龙珠. 基坑工程安全的故障树分析方法研究[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2005(12): 363-368.

LONG Xiaomei, CHEN Longzhu. Safety assessment of deep excavation engineering with FTA method[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2005(12): 363-368.

[6] 边亦海, 黄宏伟. SMW 工法支护结构失效概率的模糊事故树分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006(5): 664-668.

BIAN Yihai, HUANG Hongwei. Fuzzy fault tree analysis of failure probability of SMW retaining structures in deep excavations[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006(5): 664-668.

[7] 周红波, 高文杰, 蔡来炳, 等. 基于 WBS-RBS 的地铁基坑故障树风险识别与分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2009(9): 2703-2707.

ZHOU Hongbo, GAO Wenjie, CAI Laibing, et al. Risk identification and analysis of subway foundation pit by using fault tree analysis method based on WBS-RBS[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009(9): 2703-2707.

[8] 张小平, 王杰. 胡明亮. 事故树分析在排桩基坑工程安全评价中的应用研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011(6): 960-965.

ZHANG Xiaoping, WANG Jie. HU Mingliang. Application of FTA in safety assessment of row piles of excavation engineering [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011(6): 960-965.

[9] 曾宪明. 基坑与边坡事故警示录[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1999.

ZENG Xiaming. Warning from the accident of excavation engineering and slope[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 1999.

[10] 唐业清, 李启民, 崔江余. 基坑工程事故分析与处理[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1999.

TANG Yeqing, LI Qimin, CUI Jiang-yu. Accident analysis and treatment of excavation engineering[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 1999.

[11] 边亦海. 基于风险分析的软土地区深基坑支护方案选择[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2006.

BIAN Yihai. Selection of supporting system of deep excavations in soft soil of area based on risk analysis[D]. Shanghai, Tongji University, 2006.

[12] 徐志胜, 吴 超. 安全系统工程[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2007.

XU Zhisheng, WU Chao. Safety system engineering [M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2007.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：国家青年科学基金项目(41102177); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(Chd2011JC102; 2013G2261010)
收稿日期：2013-09-25 修改稿日期：2014-01-16
作者简介：李金和(1975-)，男，博士研究生，讲师，主要从事岩土工程勘查、地质灾害防治等方面的研究．E-mail: lijinhe@chd.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-10-05