[1]吉雪梅,张 鲲.基于城市空间形态的可步行性定量研究——以成都市少城片区为例[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2020,52(04):563-571.[doi:10.15986-j.1006-7930.2020.04.014]
　JI Xuemei,ZHANG Kun.Quantitative study on walkability based on urban spatial morphology: Taking Chengdu Shaocheng area as an example[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2020,52(04):563-571.[doi:10.15986-j.1006-7930.2020.04.014]
点击复制

基于城市空间形态的可步行性定量研究——以成都市少城片区为例()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（自然科学版）[ISSN:1006-7930/CN:61-1295/TU]

卷:
52
期数:
2020年04期
页码:
563-571
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-08-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Quantitative study on walkability based on urban spatial morphology: Taking Chengdu Shaocheng area as an example
文章编号:
1006-7930(2020)04-0563-09
作者:
吉雪梅; 张 鲲
(四川大学 建筑与环境学院,四川 成都 610000)
Author(s):
JI Xuemei; ZHANG Kun
(School of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610000,China)
关键词:
可步行性;  城市空间形态;  定量分析;  步行指数;  相关性
Keywords:
walkability;  urban spatial morphology;  quantitative analysis;  walk score;  corvrelation
分类号:
TU986
DOI:
10.15986-j.1006-7930.2020.04.014
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
步行作为一种低碳绿色的出行方式,在城市交通、环境、活力、健康等问题上起着重要的改善作用.本文选取成都市少城片区作为研究对象,定量分析了可步行性与城市空间形态之间的关系,将地块尺度、交叉口密度、道路密度、建筑平均高度与Form Syntax方法中的街道可达性、建筑密度、功能混合度结合作为城市空间形态指标,并运用步行指数方法计算了可步行性.结果显示,各指标对可步行性影响从大到小依次为:可达性、交叉口密度、道路密度、功能混合度、建筑密度、建筑平均高度、地块尺度,其中地块尺度和建筑平均高度呈负相关,其余呈正相关.研究指出提高可步行性可从城市空间形态指标的定量设计入手,为健康步行城市的建设提供了参考.
Abstract:
As a low-carbon and green travel mode, walking plays an important role in improving transportation, environment, vitality, and health of cities. This article selects the Shaocheng area of Chengdu as the research object, and quantitatively analyzes the relationship between walkability and urban spatial form. The plot size, intersection density, road density, building average height and street availability, building density, functional mix in Form Syntax constitute urban spatial form indicators. And walkability was calculated by using Walk Score. Result shows that the impact of various indicators on walkability in descending order is: accessibility, intersection density, road density, functional mix, building density, average building height, and plot size, of which plot size and building average height are negatively correlated, and the rest are positively correlated. The study indicates that improving walkability could start from the quantitative design of urban spatial morphological indicators, which provides a reference for the construction of a healthy walking city.

参考文献/References:

[1] 中华人民共和国交通运输部. 交通运输部等十二部门和单位关于印发绿色出行行动计划(2019—2022年)的通知[ER/OL]. [2019-05-31]. http://xxgk. mot.gov.cn/jigou/ysfws/201905/t20190531_3207748.html.
Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. Notice of twelve departments and units including the Ministre of Transport on Issuing the Green Travel Action Plan(2019—2022)[ER/OL]. [2019-05-31]. http://xxgk.mot.gov.cn/jigou/ysfws/201905/t201905 31_3207748.html.
[2] CERVERO R, KOCKELMAN K. Travel demand and the three ds: Density, diversity, and design[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 1997, 2(3): 199-219.
[3] 卢银桃,王德.美国步行性测度研究进展及其启示[J]. 国际城市规划,2012,27(1):10-15.
LU Yintao, WANG De. Walkability measuring in America and its enlightenment[J]. Urban Planning International,2012,27(1):10-15.
[4] LO R H. Walkability: What is it?[J]. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability. 2009, 2(2): 145-166.
[5] Walk Score.Walk Score Methodology[EB/OL]. [2018-03-9]. http://www.walkscore.com/methodology. shtml.
[6] 龙瀛,赵健婷,李双金,等.中国主要城市街道步行指数的大规模测度[J]. 新建筑,2018(3):4-8.
LONG Ying, ZHAO Jianting, LI Shuangjin, et al. The large-scale calcuiation of“walk score”of main cities in China[J]. New Architecture, 2018(3):4-8.
[7] Y Ye Y, Van Nes A. Quantitative tools in urban morphology: Combining space syntax, spacematrix, and mixed-use index in a GIS framework[J]. Urban Morphology, 2014, 18(2): 9.
[8] 叶宇,庄宇.城市形态学中量化分析方法的涌现[J]. 城市设计,2016(4):56-65.
YE Yu, ZHUANG Yu. The raising of quantutative morphological tools in urban morphology[J]. Urban Design, 2016(4):56-65.
[9] 周垠,李果.15分钟步行圈生活便利指数评价与区县比较——以成都市中心城区为例[J]. 上海城市规划,2018(5):78-82.
ZHOU Yin, LI Guo. Evalution and district comparison of life convenience index in 15-minute walking circle: A case of Chengdu central city[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review,2018(5):78-82.
[10]芦原义信. 外部空间设计[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 1985.
AWARA Yoshinobu. External space design[M]. Beijing:China Construction Industry Press, 1985.
[11]HILLIER B, HANSON J. The social logic of space[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
[12]范科红,李阳兵,冯永丽.基于GIS的重庆市道路密度的空间分异[J]. 地理科学,2011,31(3):365-371.
FAN Kehong,LI Yangbing,FENG Yongli. Spatial distribution of road density in Chongqing based on GIS[J]. Scientia Geographic a Sinca, 2011,31(3):365-371.
[13]PONT M B, HAUPT P. Spacematrix: Space, density and urban form[M]. Rotterdam: Nai Publishers, 2010.
[14]Van den Hoek J. The MXI(Mixed-use Index)as planning tool for new towns in the 21st century[M]//Provoost M. New towns for the 21st century: The planned vs. the unplanned city. Amsterdam: SUN Architecture, 2009.
[15]何晓群,刘文卿. 北京:应用回归分析[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2019.
HE Xiaoqun,LIU Wenqing. Beijing: Applied regression analysis[M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2019.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-12-06 修改稿日期:2020-07-10
第一作者:吉雪梅(1995-),女,硕士生,主要从事当代城市设计理论研究.E-mail:xuemei0819ji@163.com
通讯作者:张鲲(1966-),男,教授,硕士,主要从事当代城市设计理论研究.E-mail:ackun@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-09-25