[1]崔凯,侯家贝,邹宜彤.本土规划历史人物及其营城思想研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2024,56(03):418-425.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2024.03.013]
 CUI KaiHOU Jiabei,ZOU Yitong.A study of historical figures and their ideas about urban development in local planning[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2024,56(03):418-425.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2024.03.013]
点击复制

本土规划历史人物及其营城思想研究()
分享到:

西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版)[ISSN:1006-7930/CN:61-1295/TU]

卷:
56
期数:
2024年03期
页码:
418-425
栏目:
出版日期:
2024-06-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
A study of historical figures and their ideas about urban development in local planning
文章编号:
1006-7930(2024)03-0418-08
作者:
崔凯1侯家贝1邹宜彤2
(1.西安建筑科技大学 建筑学院,陕西 西安710055;2.西安建筑科技大学 中国城乡建设与文化传承研究院,陕西 西安710055)
Author(s):
CUI Kai1HOU Jiabei1 ZOU Yitong2
(1.School of Architecture, Xian Univ. of Arch. & Tech.Xian 710055, China 2.China Academy of Urban-Rural Development & Cultural Heritage, Xian Univ. of Arch. & Tech., Xian 710055, China)
关键词:
本土规划历史人物营城思想
Keywords:
local urban planning historical figures ideas about urban development
分类号:
TU398.9
DOI:
10.15986/j.1006-7930.2024.03.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
中华文化源远流长,在长期的历史发展中积累了丰富的本土规划营城思想,但是目前学术界对营城思想背后的规划人物了解尚浅.对于规划历史人物的生活环境、性格特征与其营城思想的影响机制还较为模糊,从历史人物的角度出发,可以较为系统的梳理本土规划理论中营城思想的特征脉络,通过对本土规划思想的人物脉络、规划特点、历史事迹及营城思想进行总结、梳理,归纳出循吏、文人、匠师、堪舆师四类本土规划人物,并对其营城思想进行总结,对于理解本土规划人物的“多重身份”,丰富本土城市规划理论体系和增强中华文化自信具有重要的价值和意义
Abstract:
In the long-standing history of Chinese culture, rich ideas about local planning and urban development have been accumulated, but further academic research is still needed to learn about planners behind ideas about urban development. The living environment, character characteristics and the influence mechanism of camp city thought of historical figures in planning are still relatively vague. From the perspective of historical figures, the characteristic vein of camp city thought in local planning theory can be systematically sorted out.This paper summarized and analyzed relations among historical figures, characteristics of planning, historical deeds and ideas about urban development in the thought of local planning, and classified local planners into respectable and morally lofty officials, literati, craftsmen, and geomancers, whose ideas about urban development were summed up. The results of this paper are of great value and significance to understanding the “multiple identities” of planners, enriching the system of local urban planning theories and enhancing confidence in Chinese culture

参考文献/References:

References

[1]马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集 第35卷[M]. 北京:人民出版社, 2016,10.

MARX K, ENGELS F. The Complete Works of Marx and Engels, Vol. 35 [M]. Beijing: People′s Publishing House, 2016,10.

[2]崔凯,王树声,严少飞.中国古代循吏营城事迹及建设思想举要[J].建筑与文化,2016(10):82-83.

CUI Kai, WANG Shusheng, YAN Shaofei. The deeds and construction thoughts of the ancient Chinese city following officials [J].Architecture and Culture, 2016(10):82-83.

[3]管仲.管子[M].北京:中华书局,2016.01.

GUAN Zhong. Guanzi[M]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company,2016.01.

[4]张玿美,曾钧,苏暻. 武威县志[M]. 武威:武威县志编纂委员会, 1982.

ZHANG Shaomei, ZENG Yun, SU Jing.Wuwei County Annals [M]. Wuwei:Wuwei County Annals Compilation Committee, 1982.

[5]魏收.《魏书》卷八十四,列传第七十二,李业兴传[M].北京:中华书局,2018.08.

WEI Shou. Book of Wei, Vol.84,Biography 72,Li Yexing Biography[M].Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company,2018.08.

[6]魏征.隋书[M].北京:中华书局,1973.08.

WEI Zheng. The Book of Sui[M]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company,1973.08.

[7]朱轼.《历代循吏传》卷首,序[M]. 苏州: 江苏书局,1730.

ZHU Shi. Preface to the Chronicles of Successive Officials [M]. Suzhou: Jiangsu Book Company, 1730.

[8]伦以训.修钦州堂记 [M]. 高州: 登云楼,1834.

LUN Yixun. Records of Repairing Qinzhou Tang[M]. Gaozhou: Dengyunlou, 1834.

[9]苏轼.孔凡礼.《苏轼文集》[M].北京:中华书局,1986.

SU Shi, KONG Fanli. Su Shi′s Collected Works[M]. Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company, 1986.

[10]白居易.白居易集(全四册)[M],北京:中华书局,1979.

Bai Juyi.Bai Juyi Collection (All four volumes)[M],Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company,1979.

[11]江西省地方志编纂委员会.江西古代名人[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2018.04:48-49.

Compiled by Local Chronicles Compilation Committee of Jiangxi Province. Ancient Celebrities in Jiangxi [M]. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press,2018.04: 48-49

[12]黄应培,乐明绍.(嘉庆)新田县志[M].台北:成文出版社有限公司,1975:120.

HUANG Yingpei, LE Mingshao.(Jiaqing) Records of Xintian County [M].Taipei: Chengwen Publishing House Co.,LTD.,1975:120.

[13]吴性诚. 捐建淡水学文庙碑记[M]//郑用锡.(道光)淡水厅志稿. 台北:远流出版社,2006:206-208.

WU Xingcheng. Monument of Donation to the Tamsui Confucian Temple [M]// ZHENG Yongxi. (Daoguang) Tamsui Hall. Taipei: Far Current Press, 2006:206-208.

[14]赵彦卫:《云麓漫钞》[M].北京:中华书局,1996:59-60.

ZHAO Yanwei. “Cloud Foot Flowing Banknote”, Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 1996: 59-60.

[15]孙诗萌. 浅论中国古代城市规划的“三个传统”[J].城市规划,2021,45(1):20-29.

SUN Shimeng. A brief discussion on the “Three traditions” of ancient Chinese city planning [J]. City Planning Review,2021,45(1):20-29.

[16]严少飞,王树声,韩卫然.宇文恺对隋代运河开凿的贡献研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(10): 83-89.

YAN Shaofei, WANG Shusheng, HAN Weiran. Yu Wenkai′s contribution to canal construction in Sui Dynasty [J]. Famous City of China,2022,36(10): 83-89.

[17]孙全胜.城市空间规划与生态正义研究 [J].中国名城,2023,37(9):3-9.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2023-12-25
修回日期:2024-04-08
基金项目:陕西省教育厅科学研究计划资助项目(21JK0202)
第一作者:崔凯(1985—),男,博士研究生,主要研究城市建筑史.E-mail:674611501@qq.com

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-07-16