[1]李晓伟,王 炜,杨 敏,等.多模式综合交通客运方式选择行为差异性—基于强制与休闲型活动出行的对比分析[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2016,48(06):868-873.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2016.06.015]
　LI Xiaowei,WANG Wei,YANG Min,et al.Disparity of choice behavior for multi-mode passenger transport system—A comparative analysis of the compulsory and leisure activities travel[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2016,48(06):868-873.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2016.06.015]
点击复制

多模式综合交通客运方式选择行为差异性—基于强制与休闲型活动出行的对比分析()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（自然科学版）[ISSN:1006-7930/CN:61-1295/TU]

卷:
48
期数:
2016年06期
页码:
868-873
栏目:
出版日期:
2016-12-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Disparity of choice behavior for multi-mode passenger transport system —A comparative analysis of the compulsory and leisure activities travel
文章编号:
1006-7930(2016)06-0868-06
作者:
李晓伟1; 2; 3; 王 炜1; 杨 敏1; 郭延永1; 华雪东1
1. 东南大学交通学院，江苏 南京 210096；2. 西安建筑科技大学土木工程学院，陕西 西安 710055；3.西部建筑科技国家重点实验室，陕西 西安 710055
Author(s):
LI Xiaowei 1; 2; 3;  WANG Wei1;  YANG Min1;  GUO Yanyong1;  HUA Xuedong1
1. School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China;2. School of Civil Engineering, Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech., Xi’an 710055, China;3.State key Laboratory of Architecture Science and Technology in West China, Xi’an 710055, China
关键词:
 ; 交通工程; 选择行为; MNL; 多模式交通; 差异性
Keywords:
traffic engineering;  choice behavior;  MNL;  multi-mode;  disparity
分类号:
U491
DOI:
10.15986/j.1006-7930.2016.06.015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为分析多模式综合交通方式下的强制、休闲活动出行行为差异性，基于旅客高速巴士、普铁、高铁和飞机四种运输方式RP调查数据，建立旅客乘车选择多项logit(MNL)模型，基于参数估计和弹性分析，揭示多模式综合交通客运方式选择行为及其差异性．研究结果表明：出行距离、出行费用、运行时间、安全性、舒适性、准时性、网络购票、售票点购票、拥有私家车是影响旅客强制型、休闲型活动出行方式选择的主要共性因素，不同因素对旅客强制型、休闲型活动出行方式选择的影响程度具有明显的差异性；另外，到站时间对强制型活动出行方式选择有显著影响，对休闲型活动出行方式选择影响并不显著．
Abstract:
The travel activities of passengers were divided into compulsory activities and leisure activities in this paper. The survey data of four kinds of transport modes were obtained by residents travel survey including intercity bus, train, high speed railway and plane. Taking bus as the reference mode, the MNL model is built. Based on the parameter estimation and elasticity analysis, the difference of the choice behavior for multi-mode transportation system is studied. The results show that travel distance, travel cost, operation time, safety, comfort, punctuality, network ticket, show ticket and car ownership are the main common factors influencing regional travel modes choice for compulsory activities and leisure activities. Different factors have obvious differences on the influence degree for regional travel modes choice about compulsory activities and leisure activities. Additionally, arrival time has a significant effect on the travel mode choice of the compulsory activity, and has no effect on the travel mode choice of the leisure activities.

参考文献/References:

[1] MARTIN J C, ROMAN C, GARCIA-PALOMARES JC. Spatial analysis of the competitiveness of the high-speed train and air transport: The role of access to terminals in the Madrid–Barcelona corridor [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2014, 69(69):392-408.

[2] 李惠. 基于活动的居民购物出行方式选择模型[D].成都: 西南交通大学, 2010.

LI Hui. Activity-based mode choice model of residential shopping trip[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiao Tong University, 2010.

[3] YAO E, MORIKAWA T. A study of on integrated intercity travel demand model[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2005, 39(4), 367-381.

[4] FREITAS A L P. Assessing the quality of intercity road transportation of passengers: An exploratory study in Brazil [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2013, 49:379-392.

[5] HSU C I, CHEN Y C, LI H C. A model on market share distribution between air transportation, high-speed rail, and automobiles[J]. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 2005, 6(11):2003-2018.

[6] MANCUSO P. An analysis of the competition that impinges on the Milan–Rome intercity passenger transport link [J]. Transport Policy, 2014, 32: 42-52.

[7] 李颖. 中国铁路旅客出行选择行为研究[D].北京: 北京交通大学, 2015.

LI Ying. Research on the railway passengers’ travel choice behavior in China[D]. Beijing：Beijing Jiaotong University, 2015.

[8] 王文宪, 陈钉钧, 吕红霞, 等.基于Nested Logit模型的铁路旅客客运产品选择研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2015,15(4):140-146.

WANG Wenxian, CHEN Dingjun, LÜ Hongxia, et al. Research of transport product choice for railway passengers based on nested logit model[J].Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2015,15(4):140-146.

[9] 张旭. 高速铁路与民航客运竞争与协同发展研究[D].上海: 上海海事大学, 2012.

ZHANG Xu. Research on competition and collaborative development between HSR and civil Aviation [D].Shanghai: Shanghai Maritime University, 2012.

[10] 卞长志, 陆化普, 尉欣欣. 城际铁路和公路长途客运的定价博弈[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2010,10(1):184- 189.

BIAN Changzhi, LU Huapu, WEI Xinxin. Price game between intercity railway and bus[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2010,10(1):184-189.

[11] 何宇强, 毛保华, 陈团生, 等. 高速铁路客流分担率模型及其应用研究[J].铁道学报,2006,28(3):18-20.

HE Yuqiang, MAO Baohua, CHEN Tuansheng, et al. Sharing rate model of passenger flow and its application for high speed railway[J]. Journal of Railway, 2006,28(3): 18-20.

[12] 叶玉玲, 王艺诗. 沪杭运输通道内旅客交通方式选择行为研究[J].铁道学报,2010,32(4):13-17.

YE Yuling, WANG Yishi. Research on travel mode choice behavior in Shanghai-Hangzhou transport corridor [J].Journal of the China Railway Society, 2010,32(4):13- 17.

[13] 卢欣. 基于计划行为学的旅客中长距离出行方式选择行为研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学,2011.

LU Xin. Research on the passenger travel choice of moderate/long-distance based on the planned behavior theory [D].Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011

[14] CHANG ICG. A network-based model for estimating the market share of a new high speed rail system [J]. Transportation Planning & Technology, 2004, 27 (2): 67-90.

[15] DOBRUSZKES F. High-speed rail and air transport competition in Western Europe: a supply-oriented perspective [J]. Transportation Policy, 2011, 18(6): 870- 879.

[16] 张迦南, 赵鹏. 综合运输通道旅客出行方式选择行为研究[J]. 中国铁道科学,2012,33(3):123-130.

ZHANG Jianan, ZHAO Peng. Research on passenger choice behavior of trip mode in comprehensive transportation corridor[J]. China Railway Science, 2012, 33(3): 123-130.

[17] 关宏志. 非集计模型—交通行为分析的工具[M].北京: 人民交通出版社, 2004.

GUAN Hongzhi. Disaggregate model-tool of traffic behavior analysis[M].Beijing: China Communications Press, 2004.

相似文献/References:

[1]李晓伟,陈 红,周继彪,等.基于累积前景理论的城市公交线网灰关联优化[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2012,44(04):495.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2012.04.008]
　LI Xiao-wei,CHEN Hong,ZHOU Ji-biao,et al.Grey relevancy optimization model of urban public transportation network based on cumulative prospect theory[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2012,44(06):495.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2012.04.008]
[2]李晓伟,陈 红,王肇飞,等.基于离差最大化的公路网灰关联投影评价模型[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2012,44(05):679.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2012.05.012]
　LI Xiao-wei,CHEN Hong,WANG Zhao-fei,et al.Grey relation projection evaluation model of highway network planning schemes based on maximizing deviation method[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2012,44(06):679.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2012.05.012]
[3]刘 伟,刘浩学,朱 彤.基于ROC 曲线优化的车辆行驶状态估计BP模型[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2014,46(04):593.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2014.04.025]
　LIU Wei,LIU Haoxue,ZHU Tong.BP neural network for vehicle state estimation was based on ROC curve optimization[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2014,46(06):593.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2014.04.025]
[4]王秋平,杨 茜,孙 皓.基于空间句法的西安市历史街区交通改善研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2015,47(04):487.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2015.04.005]
　WANG Qiuping,YANG Xi,Sun Hao.Study on improving traffic conditions for the historic district of Xi’an based on space syntax[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2015,47(06):487.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2015.04.005]
[5]白成军、,吴 葱,狄亚静.基于材份制的文物建筑测绘精度分析[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2015,47(04):560.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2015.04.017]
　BAI Chengjun,WU Cong,DI Yajing.Surveying and mapping of cultural relic building based on the material system accuracy analysis[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2015,47(06):560.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2015.04.017]
[6]郝 玲,李子萍,李志民.安全视野下中小学校校园入口交通组织规划研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2015,47(04):587.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2015.04.022]
　HAO Ling,LI Ziping,LI Zhimin.Research on the traffic organization planning of urban primary and middle school campus in the perspective of security[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2015,47(06):587.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2015.04.022]
[7]陈延信１,２,施寿芬１,等.外循环式高固气比分解炉气相流场的数值模拟[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2011,43(01):48.[doi:DOI:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2011.01.004]
　,,et al.Ｔｈｅ　ｎｕｍｅｒｉｃａｌ　ｓｉｍｕｌａｔｉｏｎ　ｏｆ　ｆｌｏｗ－ｆｉｅｌｄｉｎ　ｈｉｇｈ　ｓｏｌｉｄ　ｔｏ　ｇａｓ　ｒａｔｉｏｎ　ｅｘｔｅｒｎａｌ　ｃｉｒｃｕｌａｔｉｎｇ　ｐｒｅｃａｌｃｉｎｅｒ[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2011,43(06):48.[doi:DOI:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2011.01.004]
[8]王　琰１,２,李志民１,等.大学整体化教学楼群的概念及建构研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2011,43(01):85.[doi:DOI:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2011.01.023]
　,,et al.Ｃｏｎｃｅｐｔｉｏｎ　ａｎａｌｙｓｉｓ　ａｎｄ　ｃｏｎｓｔｒｕｃｔｉｏｎ　ｍｏｄｅ　ｓｔｕｄｙｏｎ　ｈｏｌｉｓｔｉｃ　ｃｌａｓｓｒｏｏｍ　ｂｕｉｌｄｉｎｇ　ｇｒｏｕｐ　ｏｎ　ｕｎｉｖｅｒｓｉｔｙ　ｃａｍｐｕｓ[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2011,43(06):85.[doi:DOI:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2011.01.023]
[9]方永恒,许　晶.产业集群系统协同演化动力模型研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2011,43(01):113.[doi:DOI:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2011.01.010]
　.Ｄｙｎａｍｉｃ　ｍｏｄｅｌ　ｏｆ　ｃｏｌｌａｂｏｒａｔｉｖｅ　ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ　ｏｆ　ｉｎｄｕｓｔｒｉａｌ　ｃｌｕｓｔｅｒ[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2011,43(06):113.[doi:DOI:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2011.01.010]
[10]徐　捷.大型振动台基础大体积混凝土防止裂缝产生的质量控制措施[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2011,43(01):131.[doi:DOI:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2011.01.027]
　Ｑｕａｌｉｔｙ　ｃｏｎｔｒｏｌ　ｍｅａｓｕｒｅｓ　ｐｒｅｖｅｎｔｉｎｇ　ｃｒａｃｋｓ　ｉｎ　ｍａｓｓ　ｃｏｎｃｒｅｔｅｆｏｕｎｄａｔｉｏｎ　ｏｆ　ｌａｒｇｅ　ｓｃａｌｅ　ｓｈａｋｉｎｇ　ｔａｂｌ[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2011,43(06):131.[doi:DOI:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2011.01.027]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
投稿日期：2015-12-07                      修改稿日期：2016-11-16

基金项目：国家自然科学基金重点项目(51338003)，中国博士后基金面上项目(2015M571644)，陕西省住房城乡建设科技开发计划项目(2015-K54)

作者简介：李晓伟(1985—)，男，博士，讲师，主要从事交通规划与设计方面的研究．E-mail: 185381729@qq.com

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-02-04