[1]李云燕,赵万民,杨光,等.新时期历史文化风貌区建筑价值评价的多元平衡——以重庆寸滩为例[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2018,50(01):92-99.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2018.01.015]
　LI Yunyan,ZHAO Wanmin,et al.Multiple balances of comprehensive evaluation of building value of historical and cultural feature areas under new normstake Chongqing Cuntan as an example[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2018,50(01):92-99.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2018.01.015]
点击复制

新时期历史文化风貌区建筑价值评价的多元平衡——以重庆寸滩为例()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（自然科学版）[ISSN:1006-7930/CN:61-1295/TU]

卷:
50
期数:
2018年01期
页码:
92-99
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-03-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Multiple balances of comprehensive evaluation of building value of historical and cultural feature areas under new normstake Chongqing Cuntan as an example
文章编号:
1006-7930(2018)01-0092-08
作者:
李云燕1; 2; 赵万民1; 2; 杨光1; 2; 雷娜3
(1．重庆大学 建筑城规学院,重庆 400045 ;2．山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室,重庆 400045 ; 3．重庆绿岛新区管理委员会,重庆 402760)
Author(s):
LI Yunyan1;  2;  ZHAO Wanmin1; 2; YANG Guang1; 2; LEI Na3
(1.Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 2.Key Laboratory of new Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing 400045, China; 3.Management Committee of Chongqing Green Island Area of Chongqing, Chongqing 402760, China)
关键词:
多元目标; 建筑价值; 评价; 指标体系; 寸滩
Keywords:
multi-target oriented;  building values;  evaluation;  index models;  Cuntan
分类号:
TU981
DOI:
10.15986/j.1006-7930.2018.01.015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
历史文化风貌区并非我国法定保护层次，在快速城镇化发展过程中，往往遭到市场资本的“蚕食”，在各种更新、改造的名义下慢慢消失.随着我国城市发展逐渐从增量规划转变到存量优化的新常态背景下，历史文化风貌区保护开始受到关注，保护方法成为热点.针对历史文化风貌区建筑更新改造方式较随意、缺乏科学依据的现实，通过梳理和借鉴国内外历史建筑评价指标体系，建立了基于多重目标和多元价值导向的历史文化风貌区建筑定量评价指标体系，并以寸滩历史文化风貌区保护案例进行建筑定量化评价实证检验.结果表明：历史风貌区建筑保护需要考虑风貌区发展的可能性、居民生存环境的改进、对周边区域的带动作用等等多重目标与多元化的价值取向；历史风貌区保护规划中，对于大多数建筑的评价，更注重现实经济价值、使用价值和实施性.研究结论对于提高历史文化风貌区建筑更新改造方式的科学性、客观性具有重要意义
Abstract:
Historical and cultural feature area, not a legal protected a rea in China, in the process of rapid urbanization, used to been eroded by the market capital. That slowly disappeared under the name of various renovation. With the gradually change of urban development from incremental planning to the new normal background of stock optimization, the protection of historical and cultural feature area has become a hot topic. According to the reality of casual and unscientific building renovation in the historical and cultural area, the paper believes that the multi-value orientation is an important way to guarantee the scientific and objective protection of the historical and cultural area. By combining and drawing lessons from the domestic and foreign historical building evaluation index system, the paper establishes the building quantitative evaluation index system based on the multiple goals and multiple values orientation, and this evaluation is carried out with the case of Cuntan. The results indicate that the construction protection of historical feature area needs to take into account the possibility of the development of the landscape area, the improvement of the living environment of residents, the driving effect of the surrounding area, etc., and the value orientation of multiple goals and multiple values. In the protection plan of historical feature area, the evaluation of most buildings pays more attention to the use value and practicability of realistic economic value. The research conclusion is of great significance to improve the scientific objectivity of the renovation of historic cultural features

参考文献/References:

[1]COETERIER J F. Lay people′s evaluation of historic sites[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2002, 59(2): 111-123.

[2]WANG H J, ZENG Z T. A multi-objective decision-making process for reuse selection of historic buildings [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(2): 1241-1249.

[3]YCEER H, I·PEKOGLU B. An architectural assessment method for new exterior additions to historic buildings [J]. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2012, 13(4): 419-425.

[4]KUTUT V, ZAVADSKAS E K, LAZAUSKAS M. Assessment of priority alternatives for preservation of historic buildings using model based on ARAS and AHP methods[J]. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 14(2): 287-294.

[5]STENDEBAKKEN M O G, GRYTLI E R, OLSSON N O E. Proposed aspects for evaluation of the value of spaces in historic buildings[J]. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2015, 21: 23-31.

[6]ASCIONE F, CHECHE N, DE MASI R F, et al. Design the refurbishment of historic buildings with the cost-optimal metho-dology: The case study of a XV century Italian building[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2015, 99: 162-176.

[7]BOARIN P, GUGLIELMINO D, PISELLO A L, et al. Sustainability assessment of historic buildings: lesson learnt from an Italian case study through LEED? rating system[J]. Energy Procedia, 2014, 61: 1029-1032.

[8]吴铮争, 赵荣. 关于历史建筑的 “ 修旧如旧”：兼论陕北明长城保护中的 “ 修旧如旧”[J]. 城市问题, 2014 (2): 36-40.

WU Zhengzheng，ZHAO Rong. Principle of restoring the old as old on historical architectures: taking the Great Wall of Ming Dynasty of the north of Shanxi for example [J]. Urban problems, 2014 (2): 36-40.

[9]赵彦, 陆伟, 齐昊聪. 基于规划实践的历史建筑再利用研究：以美国芝加哥为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 2013, 20(2): 18-22.

ZHAO Yan，LU Wei，QI Haocong. A study on reuse of historical buildings: Chicago case [J]. Urban Development Studies, 2013, 20(2): 18-22.

[10]温日琨, 丁烈云.基于FCA的近代建筑文化价值分级评价研究[J].四川建筑,2001,21(3）:17-20.

WEN Rikun, DING Lieyun. Study on the gradation and appraisal of modern architectural culture value based on FCA [J]. Si-chuan Architecture, 2001, 21(3):17-20.

[11]余慧,刘晓.基于灰色聚类法的历史建筑综合价值评价[J].四川建筑科学研究,2009,35(5):240-242.

YU Hui, LIU Xiao. Appraising method of comprehensive value of historic buildings based on grey clustering method [J]. Si-chuan Building Science, 2009, 35(5):240-242.

[12]赖明华,王晓鸣,罗爱道.基于正交设计的历史建筑综合价值评价研究[J]. 华中科技大学学报(城市科学版),2006,23(1):35-38.

LAI Minghua, WANG Xiaoming, LUO Aidao. Appraising method of comprehensive value of historic buildings based on or-thogonal design [J]. J. of HUST (Urban Science Edition), 2006, 23(1):35-38.

[13]翟斌庆. 香港历史地段 “ 再生” 案例的可持续性评价[J].华中建筑, 2015, 33(3): 11-15.

ZHAI Binqing. Sustainability Assessment of the regeneration practice of a historic district in Hong Kong [J]. Huazhong Architecture, 2015, 33(3): 11-15.

[14]PENI?A M, SVETLANA G, MURGUL V. Revitalization of historic buildings as an approach to preserve cultural and historical heritage[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2015, 117: 888-895.

[15]黄瓴.城市空间文化结构研究：以西南地域城市为例[M].南京：东南大学出版社，2011.

HUANG Ling. A study on cultural structure of urban space with the case study of cities in southwest China[M]. Nanjing:Southeast University Press, 2011.

相似文献/References:

[1]冯晓刚,撒利伟,石 辉.基于多元目标的主成分分析的热岛效应成因研究——以西安市为例[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2012,44(04):507.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2012.04.010]
　FENG Xiao-gang,SA Li-wei,SHI Hui.Study on the urban heat island effect based on the PCA of multi-purpose[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2012,44(01):507.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2012.04.010]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-05-08修改稿日期:2014-01-25

基金项目:重庆市基础科学与前沿技术研究专项项目（cstc2017jcyjAX0125）；城市与建筑遗产保护教育部重点实验室（东南大学）开放课题(KUAL1601)

第一作者:李云燕（1980-），男，博士，副教授，主要从事人居环境建设、城市安全等研究.E-mail：liyunyan007@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-03-15