西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版)

分离式霍普金森压杆(split Hopkinson pressure bar,简称SHPB)试验是测量材料在高应变率下动态特性的常用试验方法.基于LS-DYNA对混凝土的SHPB试验进行数值模拟,其中混凝土采用K&C模型,利用SHPB二波法理论重构了抗压状态下混凝土试件的应力应变曲线,通过对比模拟结果和试验结论,分析了混凝土试件在动态荷载作用下的破坏规律,并通过设置不同的混凝土与SHPB杆件界面摩擦因数μ,将界面摩擦效应对混凝土动态抗压强度的影响进行了量化分析.研究结果表明:随着应变率的上升混凝土动态抗压强度增加且混凝土损伤演化更充分,动力增强因子(dynamic increasing factor,简称DIF)随着μ的增加而增加,但当μ每增加0.1时,DIF的增加幅度将会下降5%左右,且端面摩擦效应对DIF影响的最大值约为60%.

Split Hopkinson pressure bar(SHPB)tests are the most popular experimental techniques used for dynamic characterization of various materials under high strain rates. A series of SHPB numerical tests were conducted based on LS-DYNA, and K&C local concrete damage model was used for modelling concrete. The stress-strain curves of the concrete specimens are reconstructed with the two-wave theory. The failure rules of concrete specimen under dynamic load are analyzed by comparing the simulation results and the test results. Furthermore, the effect of interface friction on the dynamic strength of the concrete was analyzed based on different SHPB interface friction coefficients. The results show that with the increase of strain rate, the dynamic compressive strength of concrete increases and the damage evolution of concrete is more sufficient. As the friction coefficient rises, the dynamic increasing factor(DIF)increases. While the friction coefficient increases by 0.1, there is about 5% decrease in DIF increments. Considering the effect of interface friction on DIF, the increment of DIF is about 60% mostly.

引言
1 混凝土SHPB试验测量抗压DIF原理
2 不考虑端面摩擦效应的SHPB抗压有限元模拟
3 考虑端面摩擦效应的SHPB模拟及结果讨论
4 结论

图1 试验装置
Fig.1 Test device

图2 不同尺寸网格试算对比<br/>Fig.2 Comparison of the modeling results under different mesh sizes

图2 不同尺寸网格试算对比
Fig.2 Comparison of the modeling results under different mesh sizes

表1 模型尺寸及参数<br/>Tab.1 Model dimensions and parameters

表1 模型尺寸及参数
Tab.1 Model dimensions and parameters

图3 不同速度大小的应力波拟合<br/>Fig.3 Fitting different speed of stress wave

图3 不同速度大小的应力波拟合
Fig.3 Fitting different speed of stress wave

图4 模拟结果和试验结果对比<br/>Fig.4 Comparison of simulation results and test results

图4 模拟结果和试验结果对比
Fig.4 Comparison of simulation results and test results

图5 模拟入射波、反射波和透射波<br/>Fig.5 Simulation waves of incident, reflection and transmission

图5 模拟入射波、反射波和透射波
Fig.5 Simulation waves of incident, reflection and transmission

图6 不同应变率条件下重构应力应变曲线<br/>Fig.6 Reconstruction of stress-strain curves under different strain rate

图6 不同应变率条件下重构应力应变曲线
Fig.6 Reconstruction of stress-strain curves under different strain rate

图7 模拟数据
Fig.7 Simulated data

[1] 李晓琴,陈建飞,陆勇,等.基于局部损伤混凝土模型的FRP-混凝土界面有限元分析研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2015,47(1):62-65.
[2] BISCHOFF P H, PREEY S H. Compressive behaviour of concrete at high strain rates[J]. Materials and Structures, 1991, 24(6): 425-450.
[3] ZHANG M, WU H J, LI Q M, et al. Further investigation on the dynamic compressive strength enhancement of concrete like materials based on split Hopkinson pressure bar tests. Part I: Experiments[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2009, 36(12): 1327-1334.
[4] ROSSI P, VAN MIER J G M, TOUTLEMONDE F, et al. Effect of loading rate on the strength of concrete subjected to uniaxial tension[J]. Materials and Structures, 1994, 27(5): 260-264.
[5] LI Q M, MENG H. About the dynamic strength enhancement of concrete-like materials in a split Hopkinson pressure bar test[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2003, 40(2): 343-360.
[6] GEORGIN J F, REYNOUARD J M. Modeling of structures subjected to impact: concrete behaviour under high strain rate[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2003, 25(1): 131-143.
[7] 翟毅,许金余,王鹏辉.纤维混凝土动态压缩力学性能的SHPB试验研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2009,41(1):141-148.
[8] KIM D J, SIRIJAROONCHAI K, EL-TAWIL S, et al. Numerical simulation of the split Hopkinson pressure bar test technique for concrete under compression[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2010, 37(2): 141-149.
[9] LI Q M, LU Y B, MENG H. Further investigation on the dynamic compressive strength enhancement of concrete-like materials based on split Hopkinson pressure bar tests. Part II: numerical simulations[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2009, 36(12): 1335-1345.
[10]KLEPACZKO J, MALINOWSKI Z. High velocity deformation of solids[C]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1978: 403-416.
[11]BERTHOLF L D, KARNES C H. Two-dimensional analysis of the split Hopkinson pressure bar system[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1975, 23(1): 1-19.
[12]MU Z C, DANCYGIER A N, ZHANG W, et al. Revisiting the dynamic compressive behavior of concrete-like materials[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2012, 49: 91-102.
[13]MALVAR L J, CRAWFORD J E, WESEVICH J W, et al. A plasticity concrete material model for DYNA3D[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1997, 19(9): 847-873.
[14]Committee Euro-International du Beton. CEB-FIP Model Code[S]. Wiltshire, UK:Trowbridge, 1998.
[15]TU Z, LU Y. Evaluation of typical concrete material models used in hydrocodes for high dynamic response simulations[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2009, 36(1): 132-146.
[16]李晓琴, 陈保淇, 杜茜,等. 高应变率下混凝土材料的力学行为[J]. 云南大学学报:自然科学版,2016, 38(5):773-783.
[17]LI Xiaoqin, CHEN Baoqi, DU Xi, et al. The mechanic behaviour of concrete under high strain rates[J]. Journal of Yunnan University(Natural Science Edition), 2016, 38(5):773-783.
[18]巫绪涛, 孙善飞, 李和平. 用HJC本构模型模拟混凝土SHPB 实验[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2009, 29(2): 137-142.

备注

引言

1 混凝土SHPB试验测量抗压DIF原理

2 不考虑端面摩擦效应的SHPB抗压有限元模拟

3 考虑端面摩擦效应的SHPB模拟及结果讨论

4 结论

期刊信息