西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版)

为了缓解内涝、水环境等问题,我国各地城市陆续开展海绵城市建设工作.海绵城市建设的效益是社会各界关注的重点之一.以西安市小寨海绵城市建设为例,构建海绵城市效益货币化方法,计算海绵城市建设的效益.小寨海绵城市建设项目的年效益约为2亿,以社会折现率为7%计算,在运营期为30年的效益为26.6亿元.效益约为海绵设施项目投资的2.4倍,总投资的1.3倍.效益计算方法和结果可以为我国海绵城市建设提供一定的技术支撑.

In order to alleviate the problems of waterlogging and water environment,cities in China have successively carried out the construction of sponge cities. The benefits of sponge city construction attracted more attention of the whole society. In this study,the construction of Xiaozhai Sponge City in Xi'an is considered as the research object. A method for monetizing the benefits of sponge city has been constructed,and the benefits of sponge city construction has been calculated. Results show that the annual benefit of the Xiaozhai Sponge City Construction Project is about 200 million RMB. With a 7% of social discount rate,the benefit will reach 2.66 billion RMB during the 30-year operation period. The benefit is about 2.4 times the investment in the sponge facility project and 1.3 times the total investment. The benefit calculation methods and results of this study can provide certain technical support for the construction of sponge cities in China.

引言
1 海绵城市货币化指标与方法
2 研究区域介绍与效益计算
3 结论

表1 海绵城市效益分类与各指标主要影响因素<br/>Tab.1 Benefit Classification of Sponge City and Main Influencing Factors of Each Index

表1 海绵城市效益分类与各指标主要影响因素
Tab.1 Benefit Classification of Sponge City and Main Influencing Factors of Each Index

表2 污染物进入不同功能区水环境的惩罚倍数<br/>Tab.2 Penalty multiples for pollutants entering the water environment in different functional areas

表2 污染物进入不同功能区水环境的惩罚倍数
Tab.2 Penalty multiples for pollutants entering the water environment in different functional areas

图1 洪涝灾害居民室内财产损失率曲线<br/>Fig.1 Indoor property loss curve of residents in flood disaster

图1 洪涝灾害居民室内财产损失率曲线
Fig.1 Indoor property loss curve of residents in flood disaster

图2 海绵城市改造前后内涝损失与效益<br/>Fig.2 Losses and benefits caused by water logging before and after the sponge city reconstruction

图2 海绵城市改造前后内涝损失与效益
Fig.2 Losses and benefits caused by water logging before and after the sponge city reconstruction

表3 小寨区域海绵城市建设指标体系<br/>Tab.3 The Sponge City Construction Index System for Xiaozhai

表3 小寨区域海绵城市建设指标体系
Tab.3 The Sponge City Construction Index System for Xiaozhai

图3 小寨海绵城市建设主要工程及径流调蓄流程<br/>Fig.3 The main projects and runoff regulation and storage process of Xiaozhai Sponge City construction

图3 小寨海绵城市建设主要工程及径流调蓄流程
Fig.3 The main projects and runoff regulation and storage process of Xiaozhai Sponge City construction

表4 小寨海绵城市改建效益<br/>Tab.4 Benefits of Xiaozhai Sponge City Construction

表4 小寨海绵城市改建效益
Tab.4 Benefits of Xiaozhai Sponge City Construction

[1]MAHDIYAR A,TABATABAEE S,SADEGHIFAM A N,et al. Probabilistic private cost-benefit analysis for green roof installation: A Monte Carlo simulation approach[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2016,20:317-327.
[2]OSSA-MORENO J,SMITH K M,MIJIC A. Economic analysis of wider benefits to facilitate SuDS uptake in London,UK[J]. Sustainable Cities & Society,2016,28.
[3]BARTON A B,ARGUE J R. A review of the application of water sensitive urban design(WSUD)to residential development in australia. Australian Journal of Water Resources,2007,11(1),31-40.
[4]BERARDI,UMBERTO. The outdoor microclimate benefits and energy saving resulting from green roofs retrofits[J]. Energy and Buildings,2016,121:217-229.
[5]JOKSIMOVIC D,ALAM Z. Cost efficiency of low impact development(LID)storm water management practices[J]. Procedia Engineering,2014,89,734-741.
[6]KULLER M,BACH P M,RAMIREZ-Lovering D,et al. Framing water sensitive urban design as part of the urban form: A critical review of tools for best planning practice[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software,2017,96:265-282.
[7]PENNING-Orwsell E,VIAVATTENE C,PARDOE J,et al. The benefits of flood and coastal risk management:a handbook of assessment techniques[M]. Rowsell:[s.n.]. 2010.
[8]俞茜,李娜,王杉,孟雨婷.低影响开发设施的综合效益评估指标体系研究[J].水力发电学报,2020,39(12):94-103.
[9]贾斌凯,李怀恩,黄绵松,孙文靖,党菲,付德宇.固原市玫瑰苑小区低影响开发措施改造对降雨径流的调控效益[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(1):130-135,141.
[10]杨丰潞,杨高升.海绵城市背景下LID措施综合效益量化研究[J].资源与产业,2020,22(6):75-81.
[11]沈阳,徐苑昕,吴璟.海绵城市建设对住房价格影响的定量分析——以四川省遂宁市为例[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2021,61(6):573-581.
[12]李沐寒,尹海伟,唐爽.SUSTAIN支持下的LID建设成本效益研究——以南京市鼓楼区为例[J].风景园林,2020,27(11):57-63.
[13]孙会航,李俐频,田禹,等.基于多目标优化与综合评价的海绵城市规划设计[J].环境科学学报,2020,40(10):3605-3614.
[14]刘翠,冯峰,靳晓颖.海绵城市理念下开封市雨水资源利用效益分析[J].人民黄河,2021,43(3):102-106.
[15]杨丹辉,李红莉.基于损害和成本的环境污染损失核算——以山东省为例[J].中国工业经济,2010(7):125-135.
[16]林冰钰,杨心怡,张颖诗,等.广州市核心区城市绿地降温效应研究[J].生态科学,2021,40(2):26-34.
[17]张文娟,张峰,严昭,等. 兰州市绿地生态价值的初步分析[J].草业科学,2006(11):98-102.
[18]王伟,刘玥含,杜悦,等.城市河流景观廊道生态修复技术研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2020,52(4):602-609.
[19]谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.
[20]黄琰,董文杰,支蓉,等.强降水持续过程对上海市内交通经济损失评估模型初探[J].物理学报,2011,60(4):810-819.
[21]廖永丰,赵飞,邓岚,等.城市内涝灾害居民室内财产损失评价模型研究[J].灾害学,2017,32(2):7-12.
[22]贾斌凯,李怀恩,黄绵松,等.单位LID措施缓解城市内涝效益分析计算——以固原市为例[J].给水排水,2021,57(1):58-64.
[23]王新军,曹磊,王燕,等.苏南城市中心区屋顶绿化适建性及生态价值评价[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2017,41(6):153-157.
[24]王凤珍. 城市湖泊湿地生态服务功能价值评估[D].武汉: 华中农业大学,2010.
[25]UGAI T. Evaluation of sustainable roof from various aspects and benefits of agriculture roofing in urban core[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2016,216:850-860.
[26]王桂新,沈续雷.气温变化对上海市日电力消费影响关系之考察[J].华北电力大学学报(社会科学版),2015(1):35-41.
[27]JIM C Y,PENG L L H. Weather effect on thermal and energy performance of an extensive tropical green roof[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2012,11(1):73-85.
[28]王小林,余李鑫,王旭东,等.西安市不同下垫面雨水水质分析及道路雨水利用设计[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2017,49(4):555-560.
[29]刘秀丽,邹璀.全国及九大流域分类用水影子价格的计算与预测[J].水利水电科技进展,2014,34(4):10-15.
[30]刘增超,李家科,蒋丹烈.基于URI指数的海绵城市热岛效应评价方法构建与应用[J].水资源与水工程学报,2018,29(04):53-58.

备注

引言

1 海绵城市货币化指标与方法

2 研究区域介绍与效益计算

3 结论

期刊信息