西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版)

城市产业结构是社会经济可持续发展的关键,经济活动能否持续开展取决于资源环境.因此,探讨产业结构变化对生态环境的影响,有益于社会经济健康发展.研究将延安市作为研究对象,从结构水平、结构效益、环境压力、环境状态、环境响应5个层次选取24个指标构建综合评价体系,基于熵权法和耦合协调度模型对延安市2010—2020年产业结构与生态环境的协调状态进行定量化判断.结果表明:(1)延安市产业结构和生态环境耦合度保持高度相关水平;(2)系统综合评价指数曲折上升,产业结构系统综合评价指数增长缓慢,平均增速慢于生态环境综合评价指数,延安市实现产业绿色转型面临巨大挑战;(3)两者耦合协调度总体呈上升趋势,延安市产业结构和生态环境的协调水平从濒临失调转变为初级协调,协调状态逐渐向好.

Urban industrial structure is the key to sustainable socio-economic development, and the sustainability of economic activities depends on the resources and environment. Therefore, the synergy between industrial structure and ecological environment is of great significance for high-quality economic development. This study takes Yan'an City as the research object, selects 24 indicators from five levels of structural level, structural benefit, environmental pressure, environmental state and environmental response to construct a comprehensive evaluation system, and makes a quantitative judgment on the coordination status of industrial structure and ecological environment in Yan'an city from 2010 to 2020 based on entropy weight method and coupled coordination degree model. The results show that:(1)the coupling degree of industrial structure and ecological environment in Yan'an maintains a high level of correlation;(2)the comprehensive evaluation index of the system increases in a tortuous manner, and the composite index of industrial structure system grows slowly, with a slower average growth rate than the comprehensive evaluation index of ecological environment, indicating that Yan'an faces great challenges in realising industrial green transformation;(3)the overall trend of the coupling coordination degree between the two is on the rise, and the coordination level of industrial structure and ecological environment in Yan'an has changed from being on the verge of disorder to primary coordination, and the coordination status is gradually improving.

引言
1 理论基础
2 研究区概况与数据来源
3 指标体系构建与研究方法
4 实证结果分析
5 结论与讨论

图1 产业结构与生态环境的系统耦合<br/>Fig.1 Systematic coupling of industrial structure and ecological environment

图1 产业结构与生态环境的系统耦合
Fig.1 Systematic coupling of industrial structure and ecological environment

图2 资源型城市产业结构与生态环境的关系<br/>Fig.2 Relationship between industrial structure and ecological environment in resource-based cities

图2 资源型城市产业结构与生态环境的关系
Fig.2 Relationship between industrial structure and ecological environment in resource-based cities

图3 产业结构与生态环境耦合协调度评价及应用结构<br/>Fig.3 Evaluation of the coordination degree of coupling between industrial structure and ecological environment and the structure of application

图3 产业结构与生态环境耦合协调度评价及应用结构
Fig.3 Evaluation of the coordination degree of coupling between industrial structure and ecological environment and the structure of application

表1 延安市产业结构评价指标体系<br/>Tab.1 Industrial structure evaluation index system of Yan'an city

表1 延安市产业结构评价指标体系
Tab.1 Industrial structure evaluation index system of Yan'an city

表2 延安市生态环境评价指标体系<br/>Tab.2 Ecological environment evaluation index system of Yan'an city

表2 延安市生态环境评价指标体系
Tab.2 Ecological environment evaluation index system of Yan'an city

表3 耦合协调度水平评判标准区间<br/>Tab.3 Criteria interval for judging the level of coupling coordination

表3 耦合协调度水平评判标准区间
Tab.3 Criteria interval for judging the level of coupling coordination

表4 延安市产业结构与生态环境评价指标权重<br/>Tab.4 Evaluation indicator weights of industrial structure and ecological environment in Yan'an City

表4 延安市产业结构与生态环境评价指标权重
Tab.4 Evaluation indicator weights of industrial structure and ecological environment in Yan'an City

图4 产业结构与生态环境综合评价指数图<br/>Fig.4 Industrial structure and ecological environment integrated evaluation index

图4 产业结构与生态环境综合评价指数图
Fig.4 Industrial structure and ecological environment integrated evaluation index

图5 产业结构与生态环境耦合协调度趋势图<br/>Fig.5 Trends in the degree of coordination between industrial structure and ecological coupling

图5 产业结构与生态环境耦合协调度趋势图
Fig.5 Trends in the degree of coordination between industrial structure and ecological coupling

[1]GROSSMAN G, KRUEGER A. Economic growth and the environment[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995,110(2): 353-377.
[2]王莎,童磊,贺玉德.京津冀产业结构与生态环境交互耦合关系的定量测度[J].软科学,2019,33(3):75-79.
[3]姚韬,余元冠.技术进步与产业结构演进对碳排放的动态影响[J].安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2013,41(4):463-468.
[4]蔡玉蓉,汪慧玲.产业结构升级对区域生态效率影响的实证[J].统计与决策,2020,36(1):110-113.
[5]孟望生,邵芳琴.黄河流域环境规制和产业结构对绿色经济增长效率的影响[J].水资源保护,2020,36(6):24-30.
[6]陈青.经济增长、产业结构与环境污染关系研究--以北京市为例[J].经济界,2021(3):55-61.
[7]黄纪强,祁毓.环境税能否倒逼产业结构优化与升级?--基于环境"费改税"的准自然实验[J].产业经济研究,2022(2):1-13.
[8]温彦平,王雪峰.长江中游城市群城镇化视角下产业结构与生态环境耦合协调关系研究[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2019,53(2):263-271.
[9]胡悦,刘群芳,陈国鹰.京津冀技术创新、产业结构与生态环境耦合研究[J].资源开发与市场,2018,34(9):1221-1228.
[10]李彦超.生态环境的监测与评价研究:基于山东省产业结构低碳化转型视角[J].赤峰学院学报(自然科学版),2017,33(15):46-48.
[11]苟露峰,王海龙,汪艳涛.山东省海洋产业结构演变与生态环境系统耦合研究[J].华东经济管理,2015,29(4):29-33.
[12]谢明义,徐广才,张蕊.生态涵养区农业经济发展与生态环境保护耦合协调研究--以北京市怀柔区为例[J].生态经济,2021,37(5):119-124.
[13]石鑫.海南岛自贸港建设背景下旅游生态耦合度测度与评价[J].中国商论,2021(20):40-42.
[14]李晟婷,周晓唯,武增海.基于高质量发展的省域产业生态化质量测度与分析——以陕西省为例[J].华东经济管理,2021,35(11):77-87.
[15]陈长.省域生态产业化与产业生态化协同发展理论、实证——以贵州为例[J].贵州社会科学,2019(8):122-130.
[16]余东华.黄河流域产业生态化与生态产业化的战略方向和主要路径[J].山东师范大学学报(社会科学版),2022,67(1):128-138.
[17]傅京燕,刘玉丽.粤港澳大湾区绿色债券助推产业转型的实践探索[J].环境保护,2020,48(12):24-29.
[18]田雯婷.特色小城镇的产业发展与城镇空间的耦合关系研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2018.
[19]王晓红,张宝生.知识流动视角下的组织制度与组织环境耦合度分析[J].工业技术经济,2011(6):89-93.
[20]钟茂初.产业绿色化内涵及其发展误区的理论阐释[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2015,15(3):1-8.
[21]贾良清,欧阳志云,赵同谦,等.城市生态安全评价研究[J].生态环境,2004(4):592-596.
[22]乔标,方创琳,李铭.干旱区城市化与生态环境交互胁迫过程研究进展及展望[J].地理科学进展,2005(6):31-41.
[23]王淑佳,孔伟,任亮,等.国内耦合协调度模型的误区及修正[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(3):793-810.
[24]朱江丽,李子联.长三角城市群产业-人口-空间耦合协调发展研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(2):75-82.
[25]江激宇,项升,戴姗.安徽省农业生态环境与经济耦合协调发展研究[J].沈阳大学学报(社会科学版),2019(5):531-536.

备注

引言

1 理论基础

2 研究区概况与数据来源

3 指标体系构建与研究方法

4 实证结果分析

5 结论与讨论

期刊信息