[1]刘 平,罗奇峰.地震危险性分析模型对于我国西部地区的适用性探讨[J].西安建筑科技大学学报：自然版,2015,47(06):863-867.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2015.06.019]
　LIU Ping,LUO Qifeng.Discussion of applicability of seismic risk analysis model for China’s western regions[J].J.Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.：Natural Science Edition,2015,47(06):863-867.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2015.06.019]
点击复制

地震危险性分析模型对于我国西部地区的适用性探讨()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报：自然版[ISSN:1006-7930/CN:61-1295/TU]

卷:
47
期数:
2015年06期
页码:
863-867
栏目:
出版日期:
2016-01-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Discussion of applicability of seismic risk analysis model for China’s western regions
文章编号:
1006-7930(2015)06-0863-05
作者:
刘 平1; 罗奇峰2
(1. 西安科技大学建筑与土木工程学院,陕西 西安 710054;2. 同济大学上海防灾救灾研究所,上海 200092)
Author(s):
LIU Ping1;  LUO Qifeng2
(1. School of Architecture and Civil EngineeringXi’an University of Science and TechnologyXi’an 710054China; 2. Shanghai Institute of Disaster Prevention and ReliefTongji UniversityShanghai 200092China)
关键词:
地震危险性分析; 西部地区; 椭圆模型; 龙门山断裂; 断层破裂模型
Keywords:
Seismic hazard analysis;  western regions in China;  ellipse model;  Longmenshan fault;  fault-rupture model
分类号:
P315.9
DOI:
10.15986/j.1006-7930.2015.06.019
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
地震危险性分析是地震动估计的一种重要方法，其准确性对抗震设计至关重要，因此，该方法是一项极为重要的实际工程问题．我国东、西部地区大震等震线存在明显的不同，主要表现为：西部大震的最内层等震线为沿断层延伸的条带型区域，东部大震的等震线却完全不同，用椭圆形来描述更为合适．椭圆模型是我国地震危险性分析中应用最广泛的模型．由于东、西部大震等震线的差异，假设龙门山断裂发生一次与汶川地震同等级的地震，分析成都某场地峰值加速度的超越概率．结果表明：椭圆模型对我国西部地区的危险性分析并不完全适用；对于本地区的危险性分析，用断层破裂模型或反映断层破裂长度的椭圆模型更为理想．
Abstract:
Seismic hazard analysis is a main method of ground motion estimation, whose accuracy is essential for seismic design, so it is a important practical problem in engineering. There exist obvious differences of the big earthquake isoseismals between Eastern and Western regions in China, the innermost one of the western earthquake isoseismals is a strip-type region extending along the fault, and the eastern earthquakes are completely different, ellipse described more appropriately. The Ellipse model is a most widely used model of the seismic hazard analysis in China. Due to differences between big earthquake of East and West, we assume one earthquake would occur with equal magnitude of Wenchuan great earthquake in the Longmenshan fault zone, and analyze exceedance probability of PGA for a site in Chengdu. The results show that the ellipse model for risk analysis of China’s western region is not fully applicable, and fault rupture model or ellipse model which takes into account the length of the fault rupture is more ideal

参考文献/References:

References

[1] 胡聿贤. 地震工程学 [M](第二版). 北京: 地质出版社,2006.

HU Yuxian. Earhquake engineering[M].2nd ed. Beijing: Earthquake Press, 2006.

[2] CORNELL C A. Engineering seismic risk analysis[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1968, 58(5):1583-1606．

[3] DER K A, ANG A H-S. A fault-rupture model for seismic risk analysis[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1977, 67(4): 1137-1184.

[4] POWERM, CHIOU B, ABRAHAMSON N, et al. An overview of the NGA project[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2008, 24(1): 3-21.

[5] 胡聿贤, 周克森. 缺乏地震动加速度记录地区地震动估计的映射法[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 1996, 16(3):1-10.

HU Yuxian，ZHOU Keseng，YAN Xiujie．A method for evaluation of ground motion in regions with few acceleration observation data[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 1996, 16(3): 1-10.

[6] 沈建文, 华宜平, 邱瑛, 等. 地震危险性分析的经验点椭圆模型[J]. 地震学报, 1989, 11(3): 259-267.

SHENG Jianwen, HUA Yiping, QIU Ying, et al. Empirical point-ellipse model for seismic hazard analysis[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 1989, 11(1): 259-267.

[7] 沈建文, 华宜平. 关于地震烈度衰减模型的系统偏差[J]. 地震学报, 1989, 11(1): 38-45.

SHENG Jianwen, HUA Yiping. On the systematic deviation of seismic intensity attenuation models [J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 1989, 11(3): 38-45.

[8] 杜晨晓. 1976年Ms 7.8唐山地震断层动态破裂及近断层强地震动研究[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地壳应力研究所, 2009.

DU Xiaochen. 3D modeling of dynamic fault rupture and strong ground motion of the 1976 Ms 7.8 Tangshan earthquake[D]. Beijing: Institute of China Seismological Bureau crustal stresss, 2009.

[9] 谭黎中, 孟令媛, 史保平. 1970年MS 7.7云南通海大地震强地面运动模拟[J]. 中国科学院研究生院学报,2012, 29(4): 476-484.

TAN Lizhong, MENG Linyuan, SHI Baoping. Stong ground motion simulation of the 1970 MS 7.7 Tonghai earthquake, Yunnan, China[J]. Jouranl of Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2012, 29(4): 476-484.

[10] 地震工程与工程振动编辑委员会. 汶川8.0级地震工程震害概览[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008.

Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. General introduction of engineering damage of Wenchuan Ms 8.0 earthquake[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2008.

[11] 李世成, 崔建文, 韩新民. 云南地区地震烈度衰减特征研究[J]. 中国地震, 2003, 19(3): 287-294.

LI Shicheng, CUI Jianwen, HAN Xinmin. Study on attenuation features of warthquake intensity in the Yunnan region[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 2003, 19(3): 287-294.

[12] 雷建成, 高孟潭, 俞言祥. 四川及邻区地震动衰减关 系[J]. 地震学报, 2007, 29(5): 500-511.

LEI Jianchen, GAO Mengtan, YU Yanxiang. Seismic motion attenuation relations in Sichuan and adjacent areas[ J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2007, 29(5): 500-511.

[13] 刘平, 罗奇峰. 基于“映射圆”模型的汶川8.0级地震峰值加速度衰减关系[J]. 振动与冲击, 2013, 32(3):75-78.

LIU Ping, LUO Qifeng. Wenchuan 8.0 maginatude earthquake peak acceleration attenuation relationship based on a model of mapping circle[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2013, 32(3): 75-78.

[14] YANG Z X, WALDHAUSER F, CHEN Y T, et al. Double- difference relocation of earthquakes in central- western China, 1992–1999[J]. Journal Seismology, 2005,9(2): 241-264

[15] 陈运泰, 杨智娴, 张勇, 等. 从汶川地震到芦山地震[J].中国科学:地球科学, 2013, 43(6): 1064-1072.

CHEN Yuntai, YANG Zhixian, ZHANG Yong, et al. From 2008 Wenchuan earthquake to 2013 Lushan earthquake[ J]. Scientia Sinica Terrae, 2013, 43(6): 1064-1072.

[16] 陈达生. 地震引起的地表破裂长度与震级之间的经验关系[J]. 华北地震科学, 1984, 2(2): 26-32.

CHEN Dasheng. Empirical relationship between Surface rupture length caused by earthquake and magnitude[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences, 1984, 2(2): 26-32.

[17] 汪素云, 俞言祥, 高阿甲等. 中国分区地震动衰减关系的确定[J]. 中国地震, 2000, 16(2): 99-106.

WANG Suyun, YU Yanxiang, GAO Ajia, et al. Development of attenuation relations for ground motion in China[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 2000, 16(2): 99-106.

[18] WANG D, XIE L L, ABRAHAMSON N, et al, Comparison of strong ground motion from the Wenchuan, China, earthquake of 12 May 2008 with the next generation attenuation( NGA) ground-motion models. Bull. Seismol[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2010, 100(5B): 2381-2395.

[19] 喻畑, 李小军. 基于 NGA 模型的汶川地震区地震动衰减关系. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 32(3): 552-558.

YU Tian，LI Xiaojun．Attenuation relationship of ground motion for Wenchuan earthquake region based on NGA model[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 32(3): 552-558.

[20] 杨帆, 罗奇峰. 汶川地震的 6 区域模型加速度峰值衰减关系[J]. 土木建筑与环境工程, 2010, 32(5): 29-34.

YANG Fan，LUO Qifeng．Fitting of acceleration peak attenuation with six-area model for Wenchuan 8.0 magnitude earthquake[J]. Journal of Civil，Architectural & Environmental Engineering，2010，32(5)：29-34.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2015-07-13 修改稿日期：2015-12-04
基金项目：国家自然科学基金项目（51028273）
作者简介：刘平（1984-），讲师，主要研究方向为地震动输入及城市综合防灾减灾。E-mail:lxnp0404@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-01-29