[1]李聪颖,等.雾霾天气对出行行为的影响机理研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报：自然版,2015,47(05):728-733.[doi:DOI：10.15986/j.1006-7930.2015.05.021]
　LI Congying,HUANG Yizhe,LI Gan,et al.Analysis of the influence of smog on the travel behavior[J].J.Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.：Natural Science Edition,2015,47(05):728-733.[doi:DOI：10.15986/j.1006-7930.2015.05.021]
点击复制

雾霾天气对出行行为的影响机理研究()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报：自然版[ISSN:1006-7930/CN:61-1295/TU]

卷:
47
期数:
2015年05期
页码:
728-733
栏目:
出版日期:
2015-10-29

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of the influence of smog on the travel behavior
文章编号:
1006-7930(2015)05-0728-06
作者:
李聪颖1;  2; 黄一哲2;  3; 李 敢2;  4; 易 超2;  5; 朱文强2; 刘 雯2;  6
(1. 西安建筑科技大学城乡规划学博士后流动站,陕西 西安 710055 ;2. 西安建筑科技大学土木工程学院,陕西 西安 710055 ; 3. 上海交通大学船舶海洋与建筑工程学院,上海 200240 ;4. 哈尔滨工业大学深圳研究生院,广东 深圳 518055 ; 5. 上海理工大学管理学院,上海 200093 ;6. 上海海事大学交通运输学院,上海 201306)
Author(s):
LI Congying1; 2;  HUANG Yizhe2; 3;  LI Gan2; 4;  YI Chao2; 5;  ZHU Wenqiang2;  LIU Wen 2; 6
(1.Postdoctoral Research Station of Urban and Rural Planning, Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech., Xi’an 710055, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech., Xi’an 710055, China; 3. School of Naval Architecture, Ocean & Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China; 4. Shenzhen Graduate School, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China; 5. College?of?Management, Shanghai?University?of?Science?and?Technology, Shanghai 200093, China; 6. College of Transport and Communications, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)
关键词:
交通工程; 雾霾; 出行行为影响机理; 结构方程模型
Keywords:
traffic engineering;  smog;  influence of travel behavior;  structural equation model
分类号:
U121
DOI:
DOI：10.15986/j.1006-7930.2015.05.021
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
雾霾天气下，较多出行者会对出行行为进行调整，为系统分析雾霾天气对于出行者出行行为的影响机理，将计划行为理论拓展后建立关于出行者态度、主观规范、行为控制认识、身体状况等潜变量的结构方程分析模型，并对分析模型进行了检验和改进．结果表明，雾霾天气会对采用不同出行方式的出行者产生不同程度的影响，其中出行者的态度、心理状态以及身体状况对此有较大的解释力，对应的路径系数分别为0.565、0.268、0.164；出行者过去积累的经验以及对自己雾霾天气下出行能力的认识会对其出行态度产生较大影响．
Abstract:
In smog hours, many individuals?tend to?change?their?daily?activity?schedules?and decisions. In order to analyze the influence mechanism of such weather on the travel behavior, an analysis structural model is built based on the Theory of Planned Behavior, and this paper proposes the hypotheses that the reason of individuals changing their travel behaviors in smog weather involves the attitude towards traveling in such bad days, as feeling sick, psychologically uncomfortable, individual’s past experience, the cognition of the ability to travel, and subjective norm. The model output shows that attitude, and the psychological state and physiological state have a significant impact on the traffic?behavior,?and?the?corresponding?standard?coefficients?between these latent variables and traffic behavior are 0.565,?0.268?and?0.164,?respectively. Traveler’s experience and cognition of the ability to travel will exert significant effect on the traveling attitude towards the smog weather.

参考文献/References:

References

[1] NOBLET C L, TH?GERSEN J, TEISL M F. Who attempts to drive less in New England [J] . Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2014, (23): 69-80.

[2] CHEN C F, CHAO W H. Habitual or reasoned using the theory of planned behavior, technology acceptance model, and habit to examine switching intentions toward public transit[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2011, 14(2): 128-137.

[3] 石小法, 卢林. 交通信息影响下的动态路径选择模型研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2000, 17(4): 35-37.

SHI Xiaofa, LU Lin. Study on Dynamic route choice model with travel information[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2000, 17(4): 35-37.

[4] ETTEMA D, TIMMERMANS H. Costs of travel time uncertainty and benefits of travel time information: conceptual model and numerical examples[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2006, 14(5): 335-350.

[5] 郭寒英. 基于出行者生理、心理的城市客运交通出行行为研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2007.

GUO Hanying. Study on travelers behavior based on their physiology and psychology in urban passenger transportation[D].Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007.

[6] BROOKHUIS K A, de WAARD D. The use of psychophysiology to assess driver status[J]. Ergonomics, 1993, 36(9): 1099-1110.

[7] 唐登科. 驾驶员驾车生理、心理反应与道路线形关系的研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2006.

TANG Dengke. Research on the relationship of driver’s physical and mental reaction, and road alignment [D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2006.

[8] SAKANO R, BENJAMIN J M. A structural equations analysis of revealed and stated travel mode and activity choices[J]. Transportmetrica, 2008, 4(2): 97-115.

[9] G?RLING T, FUJII S, BOE O. Empirical tests of a model of determinants of scriptbased driving choice[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2001, 4(2): 89-102.

[10] GOLOB T F, HENSHER D A. Greenhouse gas emissions and Australian commuters’ attitudes and behavior concerning abatement policies and personal involvement[J].Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 1998, 3(1): 1-18.

[11] ELIAS W, SHIFTAN Y. The influence of individual’s risk perception and attitudes on travel behavior[J]. Transportation Research Part A: policy and practice, 2012, 46(8): 1241-1251.

[12] GOLOB T F. Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2003, 37(1): 1-25.

[13] 李华敏. 乡村旅游行为意向形成机制研究[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社, 2009.

LI Huamin. Study on the formation mechanism of rural tourism behavior intention[M]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Publishing House, 2009.

[14] 段文婷, 江光荣. 计划行为理论述评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2008, 16(2): 315-320.

DUAN Wenting, JIANG Guangrong. A Review of the Theory of Planned Behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2008, 16(2): 315-320.

[15] DONALD I J, COOPER S R, CONCHIE S M. An extended theory of planned behaviour model of the psychological factors affecting commuters’ transport mode use[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2014, (40): 39-48.

[16] GOLOB T F. Joint models of attitudes and behavior in evaluation of the San Diego I-15 congestion pricing project[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2001, 35(6): 495-514



相似文献/References:

[1]李晓伟,陈 红,周继彪,等.基于累积前景理论的城市公交线网灰关联优化[J].西安建筑科技大学学报：自然版,2012,44(04):495.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2012.04.008]
　LI Xiao-wei,CHEN Hong,ZHOU Ji-biao,et al.Grey relevancy optimization model of urban public transportation network based on cumulative prospect theory[J].J.Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.：Natural Science Edition,2012,44(05):495.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2012.04.008]
[2]李晓伟,陈 红,王肇飞,等.基于离差最大化的公路网灰关联投影评价模型[J].西安建筑科技大学学报：自然版,2012,44(05):679.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2012.05.012]
　LI Xiao-wei,CHEN Hong,WANG Zhao-fei,et al.Grey relation projection evaluation model of highway network planning schemes based on maximizing deviation method[J].J.Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.：Natural Science Edition,2012,44(05):679.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2012.05.012]
[3]刘 伟,刘浩学,朱 彤.基于ROC 曲线优化的车辆行驶状态估计BP模型[J].西安建筑科技大学学报：自然版,2014,46(04):593.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2014.04.025]
　LIU Wei,LIU Haoxue,ZHU Tong.BP neural network for vehicle state estimation was based on ROC curve optimization[J].J.Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.：Natural Science Edition,2014,46(05):593.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2014.04.025]
[4]王秋平,杨 茜,孙 皓.基于空间句法的西安市历史街区交通改善研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报：自然版,2015,47(04):487.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2015.04.005]
　WANG Qiuping,YANG Xi,Sun Hao.Study on improving traffic conditions for the historic district of Xi’an based on space syntax[J].J.Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.：Natural Science Edition,2015,47(05):487.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2015.04.005]
[5]李晓伟１,２,陈　红１,等.基于ＡＨＰ－熵复合物元的城市交通可持续发展评价[J].西安建筑科技大学学报：自然版,2011,43(06):831.[doi:DOI:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2011.06.011]
　,,et al.Ｅｖａｌｕａｔｉｏｎ　ｍｏｄｅｌ　ｏｆ　ｕｒｂａｎ　ｔｒａｆｆｉｃ　ｓｕｓｔａｉｎａｂｌｅ　ｄｅｖｅｌｏｐｍｅｎｔｂａｓｅｄ　ｏｎ　ｍａｔｔｅｒ　ｅｌｅｍｅｎｔ　ｗｉｔｈ　ＡＨＰ　ａｎｄ　ｅｎｔｒｏｐ[J].J.Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.：Natural Science Edition,2011,43(05):831.[doi:DOI:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2011.06.011]
[6]王秋平,张 译,孙 皓.历史街区自行车交通特性研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报：自然版,2016,48(02):227.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2016.02.013]
　WANG Qiuping,ZHANG Yi,SUN Hao.Research on the historical block bicycle traffic characteristics[J].J.Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.：Natural Science Edition,2016,48(05):227.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2016.02.013]
[7]李晓伟,王 炜,杨 敏,等.多模式综合交通客运方式选择行为差异性—基于强制与休闲型活动出行的对比分析[J].西安建筑科技大学学报：自然版,2016,48(06):868.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2016.06.015]
　LI Xiaowei,WANG Wei,YANG Min,et al.Disparity of choice behavior for multi-mode passenger transport system—A comparative analysis of the compulsory and leisure activities travel[J].J.Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.：Natural Science Edition,2016,48(05):868.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2016.06.015]
[8]陈君,杨东援,赵清梅.公交线路选择的相关性规律和换乘总量计算模型[J].西安建筑科技大学学报：自然版,2017,49(06):835.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2017.06.010]
　CHEN Jun,YANG Dongyuan,ZHAO Qingmei.Correlation law for bus routes selection and total transfer volume calculation model[J].J.Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.：Natural Science Edition,2017,49(05):835.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2017.06.010]
[9]张娟,朱文强,王凯,等.基于Logistic的山区连续长下坡路段交通事故严重程度分析[J].西安建筑科技大学学报：自然版,2017,49(06):841.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2017.06.011]
　ZHANG Juan,ZHU Wenqiang,WANG Kai,et al.Analysis on traffic accident severity of continuous long downgrade section in the mountainous area based on Logistic[J].J.Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.：Natural Science Edition,2017,49(05):841.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2017.06.011]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2015-03-19 修改稿日期：2015-10-05
基金项目：国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(51408460)；中国博士后科学基金面上资助(2014M562380)；住房和城乡建设部科学技术项目(2013-K5-26)
作者简介：李聪颖（1977-），女，讲师，博士，主要从事城市交通规划方面的研究．E-mail：licongying@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-12-14