[1]尚路轩,高 博,郑一帆.集约化校园前策划与后评估实践案例探讨——以西安市航天城第一中学为例[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2023,55(03):424-431.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2023.03.014 ]
 SHANG Luxuan,GAO Bo,ZHENG Yifan.A case study on programming and evaluation of intensive campus: Taking Xi'an aerospace city No.1 middle school as an example[J].J. Xi'an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2023,55(03):424-431.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2023.03.014 ]
点击复制

集约化校园前策划与后评估实践案例探讨——以西安市航天城第一中学为例()
分享到:

西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版)[ISSN:1006-7930/CN:61-1295/TU]

卷:
55
期数:
2023年03期
页码:
424-431
栏目:
出版日期:
2023-06-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
A case study on programming and evaluation of intensive campus: Taking Xi'an aerospace city No.1 middle school as an example
文章编号:
1006-7930(2023)03-0424-08
作者:
尚路轩1高 博12郑一帆3
(1.西安建筑科技大学 建筑学院,陕西 西安 710055; 2.绿色建筑全国重点实验室(XAUAT),陕西 西安 710055; 3.西安建筑科技大学 设计研究总院有限公司,陕西 西安 710055)
Author(s):
SHANG Luxuan1 GAO Bo12 ZHENG Yifan3
(1.School of Architecture, Xi'an Univ. of Arch. & Tech., Xi'an 710055, China; 2.State Key Laboratory of Green Building(XAUAT), Xi'an 710055, China; 3.Architectural Design Institut, Xi'an Univ. of Arch. & Tech., Xi'an 710055, China)
关键词:
城市高密度区 学校建筑 集约模式 建筑策划 使用后评估
Keywords:
urban high-density district school building intensive mode architectural programming post occupancy evaluation(POE)
分类号:
TU244
DOI:
10.15986/j.1006-7930.2023.03.014
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
随着我国城镇化快速发展,持续增长的人口规模与有限城市用地和非均衡教育资源配置之间的矛盾愈演愈烈,面临城市高密度区用地紧张的超大规模学校,如何将校园空间集约组合,满足功能部室规范化配置的同时,创造充足的公共活动空间,是值得探讨的问题.以西安市航天城第一中学为例,运用前策划与后评估理论方法,针对校园多义性空间的规模配置和利用率等情况,展开设计决策与空间使用后评估的关联性研究,提出该类建筑空间的优化设计策略,为城市超大规模学校集约化空间设计提供参考.
Abstract:
With the rapid development of urbanization in China, the contradiction between the growing population size and the limited urban land and the unbalanced allocation of educational resources is becoming more and more serious. Facing the shortage of land use in urban high-density areas, super-sized schools need to explore how to combine campus space intensively to meet the requirements of standardized allocation of functional departments and offices while creating sufficient public activity space. Taking Xi'an Aerospace City No.1 Middle School as an example, this paper uses the theory of pre-planning and post-evaluation to study the correlation between design decision-making and post-use evaluation of space in view of the scale allocation and utilization of campus polysemous space, and puts forward the optimal design strategy of this kind of architectural space, which can provide reference for the intensive space design of urban super-sized schools.

参考文献/References:

[1]WILLIAN M Pena, WILLIAN W Caudill. Architectural analysis-prelude to good design[J]. Architectural Record, 1959(5):5-12.
[2]党雨田.乡村建设的建筑策划方法体系架构[D]. 北京:清华大学,2019.
DANG Yutian. Architectural programming method system for rural construction[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University,2019.
[3]庄惟敏.建筑策划论设计方法学的探讨[D]. 北京:清华大学,1991.
ZHUANG Weimin. Discussion on design methodology of architectural programming theory[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University,1991.
[4]庄惟敏,李道增.建筑策划论——设计方法学的探讨[J]. 建筑学报,1992(7):4-9.
ZHUANG Weimin, LI Daozeng. Architectural programming theory: Discussion on design methodology[J]. Architectural Journal,1992(7):4-9.
[5]梁思思.建筑策划中的预评价与使用后评估的研究[D].北京:清华大学,2006.
LIANG Sisi. Research on pre-evaluation and post-use evaluation in architectural programming[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University,2006.
[6]庄惟敏,党雨田.使用后评估:一个合理设计的标准[J]. 住区,2017(1):132-135.
ZHUANG Weimin, DANG Yutian. POE: the criteria of a reasonable design[J]. Design Community,2017(1):132-135.
[7]涂慧君.建筑策划GFCNP信息矩阵方法在大学校园规划中的应用实践[J]. 建筑学报,2007(5):86-88.
TU Huijun. Application of GFCNP information matrix method in college campus planning[J]. Architectural Journal,2007(5):86-88.
[8]贾园,李若星.校园建筑前策划后评估实践案例探讨[J]. 住区,2019(3):135-140.
JIA Yuan, LI Ruoxing. Case study of programming and evaluation on built environment[J]. Design Community,2019(3):135-140.
[9]黄也桐,庄惟敏,米凯利·博尼诺.城市更新中的建筑策划应对实践——以都灵费米中学改造项目为例[J]. 世界建筑,2022(2):84-91.
HUANG Yetong, ZHUANG Weimin, Michaeli Bonino. Coping practice of architectural programming in urban renewal: A renovation case of enrico fermi school in Turin[J]. World Architecture,2022(2):84-91.
[10]刘冬,张堂基,李志民,等.基于POI数据的西安市中心城区小学布点特征研究[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2022,54(5):693-700.
LIU Dong, ZHANG Tangji, LI Zhimin, et al. Research on the spatial layout characteristics of primary schools in the central city of Xi'an based on POI data[J]. J. of Xi'an Univ. of Arch.&Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2022,54(5):693-700.
[11]麻晓亮,李耀青,安雪慧.西部县级普通高中学校规模及办学条件研究[J]. 中小学管理,2008(12):25-28.
MA Xiaoliang, LI Yaoqing, AN Xuehui, Research on the scale and educational conditions of county high schools in western China[J], Primary and Secondary School Management, 2008(11):23-25.
[12]罗琳,李志民.超大规模高中空间环境量化指标与类型重构的实证研究——以陕西为例[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2018,50(1):85-91.
LUO lin, LI Zhimin. Empirical research on the quantitative index and type of ultra-large-scale high school space environment: Taking Shaanxi province as an example[J]. J. of Xi'an Univ. of Arch.&Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2018,50(1):85-91.
[13]高博.西安市航天城第一中学,陕西,中国[J]. 世界建筑,2021,371(5):96-97.
GAO Bo. Xi'an aerospace city No.1 middle school, Shaanxi, China[J]. World Architecture,2021,371(5):96-97.
[14]杜宇昂. 城市中小学校园空间集约化设计策略研究[D].广州:华南理工大学,2016.
DU Yuang. Intensive design strategy of campus space in city primary and middle schools[D].Guangzhou: South China University of Technology,2016.
[15]肯尼斯·弗兰姆普敦. 现代建筑:一部批判的历史[M]. 上海: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2004.
Kenneth Frampton. Modern architecture: A critical history[M]. Shanghai: SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2004.
[16]李志民.适应素质教育的新型中小学建筑形态探讨(下)——新型中小学建筑空间及环境特征[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2000,32(3):237-241.
LI Zhimin. A probe over the architectural form of new style schools adapt to quality education(the second chapter)architectural space and environment feature of new style schools[J]. J. of Xi'an Univ. of Arch.&Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2000,32(3):237-241.
[17]徐培超. 基于接送行为的小学空间整合设计[D].南京: 东南大学,2018.
XU Peichao. Study on primary school space intergration: based on transfer[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University,2018.
[18]庄惟敏,梁思思,王韬.后评估在中国[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2017.
ZHUANG Weimin, LIANG Sisi, WANG Tao. Post-evaluation in China[M]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2017.
[19]王昭雨,庄惟敏.点评数据驱动下的感性评价SD法使用后评估研究——以城乡历史街区为例[J]. 新建筑,2019(4):38-42.
WANG Zhaoyu, ZHUANG Weimin. POE research with kansei evaluation SD method based on review data: A case study of urban and rural historic districts[J]. New Architecture,2019(4):38-42.
[20]郑一帆. 西安市航天城第一中学公共活动空间使用后评估研究[D]. 西安:西安建筑科技大学,2022.
ZHENG Yifan. Post-use evaluation study of public activity space in Xi'an space city no. 1 middle school[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an Univ. of Arch. & Tech., 2022.
[21]王琰.普通高校整体化教学楼群优化设计策略研究[D]. 西安:西安建筑科技大学,2010.
WANG Yan. Study on optimize strategy of holistic teaching building group in university[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an Univ. of Arch. & Tech., 2010.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-02-07修回日期:2023-05-02
基金项目:“十四五”国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFC3801300)
第一作者:尚路轩(1992—),男,博士生,主要从事地域建筑研究和绿色建筑本土化方向的研究.E-mail:slx2020@xauat.edu.cn
通信作者:高 博(1978—),男,博士,教授,主要从事地域建筑研究和绿色建筑本土化方向的研究.E-mail:GB1949@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-06-28