[1]袁朝晖,杨 潇.“选课走班制”高中教学楼空间模式研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2020,52(03):424-432.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2020.03.017]
 YUAN Zhaohui,YANG Xiao.Research on the space patterns of the general senior high school teaching building under the mode of non-graded instruction[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2020,52(03):424-432.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2020.03.017]
点击复制

“选课走班制”高中教学楼空间模式研究()
分享到:

西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版)[ISSN:1006-7930/CN:61-1295/TU]

卷:
52
期数:
2020年03期
页码:
424-432
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on the space patterns of the general senior high school teaching building under the mode of non-graded instruction
文章编号:
1006-7930(2020)03-0424-09
作者:
袁朝晖1杨 潇12
(1.湖南大学 建筑学院,湖南 长沙410082; 2.中国建筑西南设计研究院有限公司,四川 成都 610042)
Author(s):
YUAN Zhaohui1 YANG Xiao12
(1.School of Architecture,Hunan University,Changsha 410082, China; 2.China Southwest Architectural Design and Research Institute Co.Ltd,Chengdu 610042, China)
关键词:
“选课走班制” 普通高中教学楼 空间模式 模块化设计
Keywords:
“Non-graded Instruction” high school classroom building space module modular design
分类号:
TU244.2
DOI:
10.15986/j.1006-7930.2020.03.017
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
“选课走班制”从根本上改变了高中的教学模式,然而现有的高中教学楼仍然基于原有教学模式进行设计,因此,新型的教学模式与原有的教学楼设计之间存在矛盾.本文对现有高中教学楼展开调研,结合“选课走班制”对教学楼空间模式的影响,运用模块化设计方法,对空间进行重新设计、整合,构建适应于“选课走班制”的教学楼空间模式,为新型教学模式下的教学楼设计提供新思路.
Abstract:
“Non-graded Instruction” has fundamentally changed the classroom mode of high schools.However, the existing high school teaching buildings are still designed based on the original teaching mode.Therefore, there is a contradiction between the new teaching mode and the original classroom building design.This article investigates the existing high school classroom building, combines the impact of the “Non-graded Instruction” on the space pattern of the classroom building, uses modular design methods to redesign and integrate the space, and constructs teaching building space module that is suitable for “Non-graded Instruction”,which provides new ideas for the design of classroom buildings under the new teaching model.

参考文献/References:

[1] 孙明,张琨,赵大颖.普通高中发展规划及建筑空间模式探索——基于“走班制”教学组织形式的发展趋势[J].建筑与文化,2016(5):150-151.
SUN Ming, ZHANG Kun, ZHAO Daying. The exploration of the planning of senior schools’development and building space model: Based on the trend of development of class-selection system[J].Architecture & Culture,2016(5):150-151.
[2]BROWN B F. An answer to dropouts, the nongraded high school[J]. Class Organization, 1964:1.
[3]LEE V E, READY D D. U.S. high school curriculum: Three phases of contemporary research and reform[J]. The Future of Children, 2009, 19(1):135-156.
[4]STEARNS E, POTOCHNICK S, MOLLER S, et al. High school course-taking and post-secondary institutional selectivity[J]. Research in Higher Education, 2010, 51(4):366-395.
[5]BEADIE N, HERBST J. The once and future schools: three hundred and fifty years of american secondary education[J]. The Journal of American History, 1997, 84(3):1030.
[6]日本建筑学会.建筑设计资料集成:教育,图书篇[M].天津:天津大学出版社,2007.
Architectural Institute of Japan.Handbook of environmental design:education & library[M].Tianjin:Tianjin University Press,2007.
[7]TAHARA Kyozo,YANOHirotoshi. A study on the reform of the japanese high school curriculum: some findings from the credit-based high school research[J]. The Japanese Journal of Curriculum Studies,1995,4(0):.
[8]日本建筑学会. 建筑设计资料集成:综合篇[M]. 天津:天津大学出版社, 2006.
Architectural Institute of Japan.Handbook of environmental design:comprehensive[M].Tianjin: Tianjin University Press,2006.
[9]秦晓梅.“选课走班制”模式下普通高中教学楼廊道空间设计研究[J]. 建筑与文化, 2017(8):133-134.
QIN Xiaomei. The design and study of the corridor space of the teaching building in the general high school under the “non-graded instruction” model[J]. Architecture & Culture, 2017(8):133-134.
[10]牛品荣. “选课走班制”高中普通教室设计及组合模式研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学.2018.
NIU Pinrong.A study on the design and combination mode of “elective class and class system” for senior high school classrooms[D]. Xi’an:Xi’an Univ. of Arch.& Tech., 2018.
[11]孙熙然. 走班制模式下高中教学建筑非正式学习空间设计研究[D].沈阳:沈阳建筑大学.2018.
SUN Xiran. Study on the design of informal learning space in high school teaching architecture under the mode of shift shift[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Jianzhu University.2018.
[12]刘琪. 走班制中学教学空间配置研究——以北京十一学校为例[D].北京:中央美术学院. 2019.
LIU Qi. Research on the Teaching Space Allocation of Class selection system middle school[D]. Beijing:Central Academy of Fine Art. 2019.
[13]朱世军,林明国,陈军,等.选课走班制情况下学校场馆及设备基本配置研究报告[J].中国现代教育装备,2018, 288(8):18-21.
ZHU Shijun, LIN Mingguo, CHEN Jun, et al. Research report of the basic configuration of school venues and equipment under “non-graded instruction”[J].China Modern Educational Equipment,2018,288(8):18-21.
[14]日本株式会社新建筑社.日本新建筑中文版学校建筑[M].大连:大连理工大学出版社,2016.
NGK INSULATORS.Architecture of School[SHINKE
NCHIKU JAPAN][M].Dalian: Dalian University of Technology Press,2016.
[15]MaríaFranciscaGonzález.The Noore Mobin G2 Primery School/FEA Studio[EB/OL].(2019-02-14)[2019-08-20].https://www.archdaily.com/911483/the-noor-e-mobin-g2-primery-school-fea-studio.
[16]张宗尧,李志民.中小学建筑设计[M].第二版.中国建筑工业出版社,2009.
ZHANG Zongyao,LI Zhimin.Architectural design of primary and secondary schools[M]2nd ed.China Architecture & Building Press,2009.
[17]IARCH.腓特烈港的新城市学校/NewCitySchool,Frederikshavn[EB/OL].(2013-02-27)[2019-08-20].http://old.moe.gov.cn//publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s4559/201412/181664.html.
[18]OTTC,Chen C.CMREKYA学校/Mindspace[EB/OL].(2019-03-03)[2019-08-20].https://www.archdaily.cn/cn/911383/cmr-ekya-xue-xiao-mindspace.
[19]麦子.太阳能学校 哥本哈根Nordhavn国际学校教学楼[J].室内设计与装修,2017(11):88-91.
MAI Zi.COPENHAGEN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL
NORDHAVN [J].Interior Design + Construction,2017(11):88-91.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-09-19 修改稿日期:2020-05-07
基金项目:国家十三五重点研发项目课题基金资助(2019YFD1101300); 国家自然科学基金项目(51708193)
第一作者:袁朝晖(1970—),男,博导,副教授,主要从事当代建筑专业教育及建筑设计理论研究.E-mail:675803213@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-07-30