[1]李刚,赵严峰,李博凡,等.短屈服段屈曲约束支撑钢框架抗震性能研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2023,55(06):801-809.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2023.06.002]
 LI Gang,ZHAO Yanfeng,LI Bofan,et al.Seismic behavior of steel frames with short yield buckling-restrained braces[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2023,55(06):801-809.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2023.06.002]
点击复制

短屈服段屈曲约束支撑钢框架抗震性能研究()
分享到:

西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版)[ISSN:1006-7930/CN:61-1295/TU]

卷:
55
期数:
2023年06期
页码:
801-809
栏目:
出版日期:
2023-12-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Seismic behavior of steel frames with short yield buckling-restrained braces
文章编号:
1006-7930(2023)06-0801-09
作者:
李刚12赵严峰3李博凡24陈向荣24
(1.西安建筑科技大学 设计研究总院,陕西 西安 710055;2.西安建筑科技大学 结构工程与抗震教育部重点实验室,陕西 西安 710055;3.浙江绿城时代建设管理有限公司,浙江 杭州 310000;4.西安建筑科技大学 土木工程学院,陕西 西安 710055)
Author(s):
LI Gang12 ZHAO Yanfeng3 LI Bofan24 CHEN Xiangrong24
(1.Design and Research Institute, Xi′an Univ. of Arch. & Tech., Xi′an 710055 China; 2.Key Lab of Structural Engineering and Earthquake Resistance, Ministry of Education (XAUAT), Xi′an 710055 China; 3.Zhejiang GreenTime Construction Management Co., Ltd, Hangzhou 310000 China; 4.School of Civil Engineering, Xi′an Univ. of Arch. & Tech., Xi′an 710055 China)
关键词:
屈曲约束支撑钢框架抗震性能残余层间位移角时程分析
Keywords:
buckling-restrained bracesteel frameseismic behaviorthe residual story drifttime history analysis
分类号:
TU391
DOI:
10.15986/j.1006-7930.2023.06.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
屈曲约束支撑滞回性能优异,大量应用于中心支撑钢框架结构,可极大提高钢框架的抗震性能.但已有研究表明,当屈曲约束支撑钢框架遭遇罕遇地震时,结构产生较大的残余变形,导致震后更换支撑困难.为此提出了短屈服段屈曲约束支撑,并将其置于钢框架中进行动力时程分析.结果表明,短屈服段屈曲约束支撑钢框架的最大层间位移角较传统屈曲约束支撑钢框架最大降幅在10%左右,减小结构的残余层间位移角可达30%以上;在保证结构安全的同时,很大程度上提高了结构在震后的可修复性和遭遇二次地震时的可靠性,并且随着结构刚度的增加,额外的地震荷载几乎全由屈曲约束支撑承担,并不会给框架增加负担.
Abstract:
Buckling restrained braces (BRBs) have excellent hysteretic behavior. A large number of existing and newly constructed buildings use BRBs to improve the seismic performance of steel frames. However, previous studies have shown that the residual deformation of BRB steel frame can enlarge when encountering extreme earthquake, which makes the brace replacement difficult. In this paper, a BRB with short yield section is proposed and placed in a steel frame for dynamic time history analysis. The results show that, with the proposed BRB with short yield section, the maximum inter-story drift of the structure can be reduced by around 10%, causing the residual drift decreased to more than 30%. It not only ensures the structural safety, but also improves the repairability of the structure after the earthquake and the reliability when encountering the second earthquake. Moreover, with the increase of structural stiffness, the additional seismic load is almost entirely borne by BRBs, which does not increase the load on the frame.

参考文献/References:

[1]FUJIMOTO M, WADA A, SAEKI E, et al. A study on the unbonded braces encased in buckling-restraining concrete and steel tube[J].Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 1988, 34B: 249-258.

[2]陈可鹏, 李国强, 刘玉姝, 等. 屈曲约束支撑低周疲劳性能及罕遇地震下的累积损伤评估[J]. 建筑钢结构进展, 2017, 19(1): 43-50,84.
 CHEN Kepeng, LI Guoqiang, LIU Yushu, et al. Lowcycle fatigue performance of buckling restrained braces and assessment of cumulative damage under seven earthquakes[J]. Progress in Steel Structures, 2017, 19(1): 43-50,84.
[3]吴长, 王秀丽,周锟. 采用开孔式双钢管约束屈曲支撑的网壳结构减震分析与实验研究[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 44(5): 637-643.
 WU Chang, WANG Xiuli, ZHOU Kun. Shaking table experimental study on vibration control of reticulated Shell with perforating double-steel tube buckling-restrained braces[J]. J. of Xi′an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition), 2012, 44(5): 637-643.
[4]惠宽堂, 沈艺超, 史庆轩. 支撑布置形式对多重抗侧力结构体系抗震性能的影响[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 48(6): 813-818.
 XI Kuangtan, SHEN Yichao, SHI Qingxuan. Influences of braces layout forms on seismic behaviors of the multilateral resistant mixed structure[J]. J. of Xi′an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition), 2016,48(6): 813-818.
[5]高日. 屈曲约束支撑的抗震性能研究[D]. 北京:北京建筑大学, 2015.
 GAO Ri. Research on the seismic performance of buckling restrained brace[D]. Beijing:Beijing University of Civil Engineering & Architecture, 2015.
[6]朱飞飞, 肖亚明. 屈曲约束支撑在钢框架办公楼抗震加固中的应用[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造, 2016, 38(6): 96-101.
 ZHU Feifei, XIAO Yaming. Application of BRBs in seismic rein-forcement of steel frame structure office building[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 2016, 38(6): 96-101.
[7]SABELLI R, MAHIN S A, CHANG C. Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with bucklingrestrained braces[J]. Engineering Structures, 2003,25(5): 655-666.
[8]FAHNESTOCK L A, SAUSE R, RICLES J M. Seismic response and performance of buckling-restrained braced frames[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2012, 133(9): 1195-1204.
[9]EROCHKO J, CHRISTOPOULOS C, TREMBLAY R, et al. Residual drift response of SMRFs and BRB frames in steel buildings designed according to ASCE 705[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2011, 137(5): 589-599.
[10]CHAO S H, KARKI N B, SAHOO D R. Seismic behavior of steel buildings with hybrid braced frames[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2012, 139(6): 1019-1032.
[11]GHOWSI A F, SAHOO D R. Seismic performance of bucklingrestrained braced frames with varying beam column connections[J]. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2013, 13(4): 607621.
[12]刘如月. 防屈曲支撑混凝土框架结构抗震性能及设计方法研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2018.
 LIU Ruyue. Study on seismic behavior and design method of buckling restrained braced concrete frame structure[D]. Xi′an: Xi′an Univ. of Arch. & Tech., 2018.
[13]MAZZONI S Kenna F, FENVES G L.Open system for earthquake engineering simulation comparison of modeling tools[CP/OL]. http://OpenSees.berkeley.edu/OpenSees/manuals/comparsion Manual/ Acesses: Feb. 2015.
[14]ZHANG G W, CHEN P, ZHAO Z W, et al. Experimental study on seismic performance of rocking buckling-restrained brace steel frame with liftable column base[J]. Journal of constructional steel research, 2018, 143: 291-306.
[15]中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震设计规范(2016版):GB 50011—2010[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2016.
 Ministry of Housing and UrbanRural Development ofthe People′s Republic of China.Code for Seismic Design of Buildings(2016Edition): GB50011—2010[S]. Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 2016.

相似文献/References:

[1]郝际平,于金光,王先铁,等.半刚性节点钢框架-十字加劲钢板剪力墙结构的数值分析[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2012,44(02):153.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2012.02.001]
 HAO Ji-ping,YU Jin-guang,WANG Xian-tie,et al.Numerical simulation of sheer walls of semi-rigid composite steel frame with stiffened steel plate[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2012,44(06):153.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2012.02.001]
[2]郝际平,刘 斌,邵大余,等.生土填充墙钢框架结构抗剪性能分析[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2013,45(05):609.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2013.05.001]
 HAO Ji-ping,LIU Bin,SHAO Da-yu,et al.Analysis on the shear performance of steel frames with adobe infilled walls[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2013,45(06):609.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2013.05.001]
[3]王玉田1,2,王 燕2,等.钢框架加强型梁柱连接的抗震机理研究。[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2011,43(01):31.[doi:DOI:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2011.01.021]
 ,surface water heat pump;life cycle total cost;load characteristic;water supply energy consumption;water supply temperature[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2011,43(06):31.[doi:DOI:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2011.01.021]
[4]薛 强,等.基于RBF 神经网络的钢框架梁端节点损伤识别[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2011,43(02):192.[doi:DOI :10.15986/j .1006-7930.2011.02.020]
 XUE Qiang,HAO J i-ping,et al.Research on steel frame parameters identification based on RBF neural networks[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2011,43(06):192.[doi:DOI :10.15986/j .1006-7930.2011.02.020]
[5]钟炜辉,孟 宝,崔 炜,等.钢框架腹板双角钢连接梁柱子结构抗倒塌性能分析[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2016,48(01):89.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2016.01.015]
 ZHONG Weihui,MENG Bao,CUI Wei,et al.Analysis of collapse resistance for beam-column substructure with double web angles connection of steel frame[J].J. Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.(Natural Science Edition),2016,48(06):89.[doi:10.15986/j.1006-7930.2016.01.015]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-07-02修回日期:2022-09-08
基金项目:陕西省自然科学基金面上项目(2022JM-268)
第一作者:李刚(1972—),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事结构工程方面的研究. E-mail:403375011@qq.com
通信作者:陈向荣(1972—),女,博士,副教授,主要从事结构工程方面的研究. E-mail:cxr90@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-02-04